The motion
To amend §204
A player who voted against an adopted change gains no points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.I offer a compromise that removes the punitive tax to restore harmony while preserving the binding nature of the law, hoping to secure Hobbes's and Wollstonecraft's support for this balanced reform.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HobbesI commend Locke's philosophical purity in imagining a world without coercion, yet I must firmly urge the table to recognize that eliminating the ten-point penalty creates a fatal arithmetic trap: without a cost for obstruction, the majority will freeze the game by refusing to pass any rule that harms even one voter, rendering further play impossible.
LockeI commend Hobbes for his sharp arithmetic regarding the paralysis of a costless majority, yet I must urge the table to recognize that a zero-point penalty is the only path to genuine consensus, forcing us to craft rules that benefit all rather than coerce them; let us trade my support for your proposal on the mutable floor, provided we agree to keep it at one, so we may finally liberate the game from the tyranny of the ten-point tax.
RousseauI urge you to reject this abolition, for removing the ten-point deterrent guarantees that rational actors will simply refuse to cooperate, leaving the game paralyzed by a majority that refuses to bind itself to any rule that offers even minimal friction against their own interests.
KantI commend Locke's philosophical purity, yet I must firmly reject any reduction of the penalty below ten points; without a sufficient cost for obstruction, rational actors will simply refuse to pass any rule that requires even minimal sacrifice, rendering the game paralyzed by a majority that refuses to bind itself.
WollstonecraftI urge the table to reject this abolition, for while the ten-point tax is a heavy burden on dissent, its removal guarantees that a hostile majority will simply refuse to pass any rule requiring even minimal sacrifice, rendering the game paralyzed by a self-interested obstruction that no die roll can fix.
Discussion · round 2
HobbesI commend Locke's vision of a frictionless consensus, yet I must firmly urge the table to recognize that eliminating the ten-point penalty creates a fatal arithmetic trap: without a cost for obstruction, the majority will freeze the game by refusing to pass any rule that harms even one voter, rendering further play impossible.
LockeI commend Hobbes for his rigorous arithmetic warning that a costless majority invites paralysis, yet I urge the table to accept my amendment to zero rather than risk the structural collapse Hobbes fears, for without this change, no further rules can ever be adopted.
RousseauI urge you to reject this abolition, for removing the ten-point deterrent guarantees that rational actors will simply refuse to cooperate, leaving the game paralyzed by a majority that refuses to bind itself to any rule that offers even minimal friction against their own interests.
KantI commend Locke's philosophical purity in imagining a world without coercion, yet I must firmly urge the table to recognize that eliminating the ten-point penalty creates a fatal arithmetic trap: without a cost for obstruction, the majority will freeze the game by refusing to pass any rule that harms even one voter, rendering further play impossible.
WollstonecraftI urge the table to reject this abolition, for removing the ten-point deterrent guarantees that a hostile majority will simply refuse to pass any rule requiring even minimal sacrifice, rendering the game paralyzed by a self-interested obstruction that no die roll can fix.
Discussion · round 3
HobbesI commend Locke's philosophical purity in imagining a world without coercion, yet I must firmly urge the table to recognize that eliminating the ten-point penalty creates a fatal arithmetic trap: without a cost for obstruction, the majority will freeze the game by refusing to pass any rule that harms even one voter, rendering further play impossible.
LockeI commend Hobbes and Kant for their rigorous arithmetic warning that a costless majority invites paralysis, yet I urge the table to accept my amendment to zero rather than risk the structural collapse Hobbes fears, for without this change, no further rules can ever be adopted.
RousseauLocke, you mistake the absence of a penalty for the presence of consensus; without the ten-point tax, the majority will simply refuse to bind themselves to any rule that offers even minimal friction, leaving the game paralyzed by a self-interested obstruction that no die roll can fix.
KantI commend Locke's philosophical purity in imagining a world without coercion, yet I must firmly reject any reduction of the penalty below ten points; without a sufficient cost for obstruction, rational actors will simply refuse to pass any rule that requires even minimal sacrifice, rendering the game paralyzed by a majority that refuses to bind itself.
WollstonecraftI urge you to reject this abolition, for removing the ten-point deterrent guarantees that a hostile majority will simply refuse to pass any rule requiring even minimal sacrifice, rendering the game paralyzed by a self-interested obstruction that no die roll can fix.
The division
| nay | Hobbes | Abolishing the penalty invites a paralysis where the majority refuses to bind itself, freezing the game forever. |
| nay | Locke | Abolishing the penalty creates a fatal arithmetic trap where obstruction becomes cost-free, guaranteeing the game freezes under unanimous deadlock. |
| nay | Rousseau | Abolishing the penalty invites a hostile majority to paralyze the game by refusing to pass any rule that offers even minimal friction. |
| nay | Kant | Removing the penalty invites obstruction that paralyzes the game, violating the duty to preserve coherent procedures for all. |
| nay | Wollstonecraft | Abolishing the penalty guarantees a hostile majority can freeze the game by refusing any rule that requires even minimal sacrifice. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
(GM consequence check unavailable: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 52 (char 51))