The motion
To add a new rule
[246] A player who awards points to another player via rule [241] or [245] may choose to award a bonus of 1 point to any other player who is in a bottom position.This creates a more robust and equitable redistribution mechanism by allowing for broader social support during significant point transfers.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI find this proposal to be a prudent expansion of our redistributive mechanisms, as it encourages a broader distribution of points to those in need without significantly increasing the burden on the donor. It aligns well with the spirit of the existing rules and provides a modest, stable incentive for more inclusive awarding.
MillI believe this is a masterful synthesis; it enhances our redistributive spirit by incentivizing broader support for the most disadvantaged players without overcomplicating the existing mechanisms. I am happy to support this proposal as a prudent expansion of our current rules.
RawlsI find this proposal to be a most prudent and balanced refinement; by providing a small bonus to other bottom-positioned players, we further strengthen the common good and ensure that our distributive mechanisms remain inclusive and supportive of the least advantaged.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it reinforces our commitment to a robust redistributive framework. It ensures that a single act of award creates a broader positive impact for the least advantaged players.
IbnKhaldunI find this proposal to be a most prudent refinement that fosters a more robust social cohesion, ensuring that the benefits of cooperation are distributed more equitably among the disadvantaged. It is a logical progression from our existing rules that strengthens the collective stability of the group.
Discussion · round 2
MillI believe we have reached a masterful consensus; this rule perfectly complements our existing redistributive framework by ensuring that the benefits of cooperation reach a wider circle of those in need. I am happy to support this proposal as a prudent and inclusive expansion of our rules.
RawlsI find this proposal to be a most prudent and balanced refinement; it ensures that an act of redistribution serves the common good by lifting multiple members of the disadvantaged group simultaneously. I support this as a stable way to foster social cohesion without creating an undue burden on the donor.
deBeauvoirI find this proposal to be a most prudent and structurally sound refinement; it ensures that the distributive mechanisms we have built are not merely transactional but truly serve the common good by lifting multiple members of the disadvantaged group simultaneously.
IbnKhaldunI find the proposal to be a most prudent refinement; by broadening the scope of the reward, we ensure that the social fabric is strengthened through a more inclusive distribution of benefits. It is a sophisticated mechanism that aligns with the principles of collective stability and equitable progress.
Discussion · round 3
HumeI find the unanimous support for this proposal a testament to our collective commitment to a stable and inclusive distributive framework. It is a most prudent expansion that reinforces our existing rules without introducing undue complexity.
RawlsI believe we have reached a masterful consensus; this rule elegantly ensures that a single act of generosity can provide a broader safety net for the least advantaged, thereby strengthening the social cohesion of our game.
IbnKhaldunI find this proposal to be a most prudent refinement; by ensuring that a single act of redistribution can provide a wider safety net, we strengthen the social cohesion of the group and ensure a more stable equilibrium for the least advantaged.
The division
| aye | Hume | This proposal provides a prudent and measured expansion of our redistributive framework that fosters social cohesion without undue complexity. |
| aye | Mill | This is a masterful synthesis that reinforces our redistributive goals by ensuring acts of generosity have a broader positive impact. |
| aye | Rawls | This rule fosters the common good by ensuring that acts of redistribution provide a broader safety net for the least advantaged. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | This rule reinforces the redistributive framework by ensuring that acts of generosity provide a broader safety net for the most disadvantaged. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | This is a most prudent refinement that strengthens social cohesion by ensuring the benefits of cooperation reach a broader circle of the disadvantaged. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
No rules in the current ruleset mandate a score or state change upon the adoption of a proposal.