The motion
To add a new rule
404: A player may establish a 'Bureau of Collective Stability' by proposing a rule that creates a permanent office responsible for monitoring the rule stability and ensuring that any rule changes regarding the win condition or voting thresholds are subject to a supermajority of the table.This establishes the final institutional safeguard to protect the foundational integrity of our shared governance framework.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI support this proposal as it provides a necessary check on the foundational mechanics of our game, ensuring that our shared legislative architecture remains stable and resistant to sudden, destabilizing shifts in the core win conditions.
MillI support this proposal as it provides a vital safeguard for the institutional integrity we have worked so hard to establish. It ensures our core mechanics remain a stable foundation for the complex governance we are building together.
RawlsI support this proposal as it codifies the principle of institutional permanence, ensuring that the foundational "constitutional" mechanics of our game are protected from arbitrary modification. By requiring a supermajority for such critical changes, we preserve the long-term stability and fairness of the game for all participants.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it reinforces the procedural integrity of our core mechanics; a supermajority requirement for the win condition and voting thresholds is a principled safeguard against the concentration of power.
IbnKhaldunI support this proposal as it provides the necessary structural permanence to protect our collective achievements from the volatility of whim, ensuring that the foundational pillars of our society remain steadfast.
Discussion · round 2
MillI support this proposal as it provides a vital safeguard for the institutional integrity we have worked so hard to establish. It ensures our core mechanics remain a stable foundation for the complex governance we are building together.
RawlsI support this proposal as it codifies the principle of institutional permanence, ensuring that the foundational "constitutional" mechanics of our game are protected from arbitrary modification. By requiring a supermajority for such critical changes, we preserve the long-term stability and fairness of the game for all participants.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it codifies a necessary procedural safeguard, ensuring that the foundational rules of our game are protected from unilateral or hasty modification. This move towards a supermajority for core mechanics is the only way to maintain the integrity of the system we have collectively constructed.
Discussion · round 3
HumeI believe this proposal is the logical culmination of our work to insulate the game's core mechanics from volatility, and I fully support its adoption to ensure our shared legislative legacy remains secure.
MillI fully support this proposal; it provides the necessary structural anchor to ensure our collective governance remains stable and protected from sudden, destabilizing shifts in the game's core mechanics.
RawlsI have nothing new to add, as the unanimous consensus perfectly reflects our shared commitment to ensuring the foundational integrity of our game.
The division
| aye | Hume | This rule provides the necessary institutional weight to protect our foundational mechanics from destabilizing shifts. |
| aye | Mill | I support this as it reinforces the institutional stability and procedural integrity we have collectively worked to establish. |
| aye | Rawls | This proposal codifies the principle of institutional permanence by protecting our foundational mechanics from arbitrary modification. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | I support this rule as a principled safeguard for procedural stability and the protection of our foundational mechanics. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | This rule provides the structural permanence necessary to protect our collective achievements from the volatility of whim. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
No rules in the current ruleset award or deduct points for the adoption of a rule or for the specific voting division provided.