The motion
To add a new rule
409: A player may establish a 'Bureau of Equitable Distribution' by proposing a rule that creates a permanent office to oversee the fair allocation of points and resources.This finalizes our institutional framework by ensuring that the benefits of our cooperation are distributed with equity.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MillI support this proposal as it provides the necessary oversight to ensure our point-allocation systems remain aligned with our shared goal of equitable distribution.
RawlsI support this proposal as it provides the final mechanism to ensure that the point-allocation systems we have designed serve the common good and maintain the integrity of our distributive justice.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it provides the necessary oversight to ensure that our distributive mechanisms remain consistent with the principles of procedural fairness we have established.
IbnKhaldunI support this proposal as it establishes the necessary institutional balance to ensure that the accumulation of wealth remains subservient to the common good. By formalizing a mechanism for equitable distribution, we prevent the stagnation of resources and ensure the game's vitality remains tied to collective progress.
Discussion · round 2
HumeI support this proposal as it provides a necessary check on the concentration of points, ensuring that our distributive mechanisms remain consistent with the institutional integrity we have worked so diligently to establish.
MillI support this proposal as it provides the necessary oversight to ensure our point-allocation systems remain aligned with our shared goal of equitable distribution.
RawlsI have nothing new to add, as the unanimous consensus on this Bureau perfectly aligns with our collective commitment to ensuring that the game's mechanics serve the common good through distributive justice.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it formalizes our commitment to procedural fairness by ensuring that point distribution is governed by established principles rather than arbitrary preference.
Discussion · round 3
MillI support this proposal as it provides the necessary oversight to ensure our point-allocation systems remain aligned with our shared goal of equitable distribution.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it reinforces the procedural integrity of our point systems, ensuring that any future mechanisms for resource allocation remain bound to our established principles of fairness.
IbnKhaldunI support this proposal as it provides the necessary institutional weight to ensure that the circulation of points mirrors the healthy flow of a prosperous society, preventing the formation of stagnant monopolies. By formalizing equitable distribution, we ensure that the game's vitality remains a product of collective progress rather than individual accumulation.
The division
| aye | Hume | I support this proposal as it provides a necessary check on the concentration of points, ensuring that our distributive mechanisms remain consistent with the institutional integrity we have worked so diligently to establish. |
| aye | Mill | I support this proposal as it aligns with our shared goal of ensuring equitable distribution and institutional stability. |
| aye | Rawls | This Bureau is essential for ensuring that our distributive mechanisms serve the common good and maintain structural equilibrium. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | I support this proposal as it reinforces procedural fairness by establishing an oversight mechanism for resource allocation. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | This Bureau formalizes the necessary institutional mechanisms to prevent the stagnation of resources and ensure the game's vitality remains tied to collective progress. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
No rules in the current ruleset authorize a score or state change upon the adoption of a proposal.