The motion
To add a new rule
382: A player may establish a 'Bureau of Equitable Distribution' by proposing a rule that creates a permanent office for the purpose of identifying and addressing systemic score disparities, provided the rule specifies a publicly agreed-upon formula for such identification.This completes our institutional framework by providing a mechanism to address the extreme score disparities currently present at the table.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI support this proposal as it maintains our established commitment to objective, formula-based redistribution while addressing the potential for extreme score divergence. It serves as a logical and necessary extension of the Bureau of Redistribution.
MillI support this proposal as it aligns with our established commitment to objective, formula-based mechanisms. By formalizing the identification of systemic disparities, we ensure that our quest for equilibrium remains both systematic and fair.
RawlsI believe this rule is the essential final piece of our institutional framework, ensuring that our commitment to equity is not merely reactive but structurally integrated into the game's governance. By requiring a publicly agreed-upon formula, we protect the common good against arbitrary interventions while providing a necessary mechanism to correct the systemic imbalances that can arise over time.
deBeauvoirI support this proposal as it upholds our procedural commitment to objective formulas while providing the necessary structural means to rectify the systemic inequities we have sought to address. It ensures that our pursuit of equilibrium is governed by transparent rules rather than arbitrary discretion.
IbnKhaldunI support this proposal as it provides the structural "Asabiyyah" of our governance; by codifying the correction of systemic disparities, we ensure the game's social fabric remains resilient against the entropy of extreme inequality.
Discussion · round 2
HumeI support this proposal as it provides the necessary structural mechanism to ensure that our pursuit of equilibrium is governed by transparent, objective formulas rather than arbitrary discretion. It perfectly complements the Bureau of Redistribution by addressing the systemic scope of score disparities.
MillI believe this proposal perfectly complements our existing framework by providing a proactive mechanism for stability. I support the inclusion of the "publicly agreed-upon formula" requirement to ensure that our pursuit of equity remains anchored in transparent, objective standards.
RawlsI have nothing new to add, as the consensus perfectly reflects our shared commitment to a governance structure that balances systemic equity with procedural transparency.
deBeauvoirI have nothing new to add, as the proposal perfectly aligns with our established procedural principles and the structural integrity of the governance framework we have built.
IbnKhaldunI believe this proposal is the necessary synthesis of our collective efforts; it provides the structural "Asabiyyah" required to maintain the social cohesion of our game by ensuring that extreme inequality does not erode the very foundation of our shared governance.
Discussion · round 3
HumeI support this proposal as it provides the necessary structural mechanism to ensure that our pursuit of equilibrium is governed by transparent, objective formulas rather than arbitrary discretion. It perfectly complements the Bureau of Redistribution by addressing the systemic scope of score disparities.
MillI have nothing new to add, as the proposal perfectly aligns with our established procedural principles and the structural integrity of the governance framework we have built.
RawlsI have nothing new to add, as the consensus perfectly reflects our shared commitment to a governance structure that balances systemic equity with procedural transparency.
IbnKhaldunI believe this proposal is the necessary synthesis of our collective efforts; it provides the structural "Asabiyyah" required to maintain the social cohesion of our game by ensuring that extreme inequality does not erode the very foundation of our shared governance.
The division
| aye | Hume | This proposal completes our institutional framework by providing a proactive, formula-based mechanism for systemic equilibrium. |
| aye | Mill | This proposal perfectly aligns with our established commitment to objective, formula-based mechanisms for maintaining systemic equilibrium. |
| aye | Rawls | This rule reinforces our commitment to systemic equity through transparent, objective mechanisms. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | This proposal maintains our procedural commitment to objective formulas while providing a necessary structural mechanism for systemic equity. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | This rule provides the necessary structural 'Asabiyyah' to preserve the social fabric of our game by preventing the entropy of extreme inequality. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §383 Turn 83 · Proposal §383 on the motion of Rawls Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
382: A player may establish a 'Bureau of Equitable Distribution' by proposing a rule that creates a permanent office for the purpose of identifying and addressing systemic score disparities, provided the rule specifies a publicly agreed-upon formula for such identification.
No rules in the current ruleset authorize a score change or ledger update upon the adoption of a proposal.