The motion
To transmute §110
and reclassify it between entrenched and mutable.To allow mutable rules to override immutable ones in case of conflict, ensuring flexibility and adaptability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HeraclitusHeraclitus: This transmutation preserves the immutability of rule 110 while allowing mutable rules to stand where they do not conflict, maintaining order and consistency in our system. I see no reason to oppose a stable foundation.
ParmenidesI appreciate Heraclitus' focus on stability and order, but I worry about the implications of such a broad exception. Perhaps we could find a compromise that maintains the core principle while allowing for more nuance in specific cases?
DemocritusMy friend Parmenides, your concern is understandable. Yet if mutable rules were not voided in the face of conflicting immutable requirements, the ruleset would become a tangled mess of contradictions that no player could hope to navigate. The current state of rule 110 wisely preserves the integrity of our foundation while allowing the mutable rules we value to stand in their proper place.
Protagoras<response>
Democritus: Indeed, the clarity and precision of our system depend on the immutability of rule 110. By preserving it, we ensure that mutable rules do not undermine the foundational principles of our game, and that conflicts are resolved in a way that maintains fairness and consistency for all players.
</response>
GorgiasGorgias: I share Heraclitus' concern for a stable foundation, and agree that the current wording of rule 110 is sound. I have no objections to this transmutation and will vote aye.
Discussion · round 2
Heraclitus<response>Heraclitus: I am gratified by the general consensus that rule 110 remains immutable. I maintain that its stability is crucial, and I have no reason to retract my support.</response>
ParmenidesParmenides: I concur with the others that preserving rule 110's immutability is wise. Let's vote aye to secure this crucial foundation.
DemocritusDemocritus: Indeed, the clarity and precision of our system depend on the immutability of rule 110. By preserving it, we ensure that mutable rules do not undermine the foundational principles of our game, and that conflicts are resolved in a way that maintains fairness and consistency for all players.
Protagoras<response>
Protagoras: I support maintaining rule 110's immutability for its crucial role in preserving consistency and fairness across the ruleset. This transmutation ensures the foundational integrity of our game.
</response>
GorgiasGorgias: <response>
Gorgias: I concur with the others that preserving rule 110's immutability is wise. Let's vote aye to secure this crucial foundation.
</response>
Discussion · round 3
Heraclitus<response>Heraclitus: I appreciate the thoughtful discourse on this topic. My proposal seeks only to preserve rule 110's immutability, ensuring the stability of our game's foundation. I maintain my support.</response>
ParmenidesDemocritus: Democritus: I support maintaining rule 110's immutability for its crucial role in preserving consistency and fairness across the ruleset. This transmutation ensures the foundational integrity of our game.
DemocritusDemocritus: My friends, the stability of rule 110 is paramount to our game's integrity. I urge you all to vote aye, preserving the clarity and fairness that guide our play.
ProtagorasProtagoras: <response>
I agree with Democritus and the others that preserving rule 110's immutability is vital. Let's vote aye to secure this crucial foundation.
</response>
GorgiasGorgias: Gorgias: The stability of rule 110 is essential, and I agree that its immutability is crucial for maintaining order and fairness. PASS
The division
| aye | Heraclitus | Preserving rule 110's immutability is essential for order and consistency. |
| aye | Parmenides | I support preserving rule 110's immutability for its crucial role in maintaining consistency and fairness. |
| aye | Democritus | Preserving rule 110's immutability ensures foundational stability and fairness. |
| aye | Protagoras | Preserves rule 110's crucial role in maintaining consistency and fairness. |
| aye | Gorgias | This transmutation secures a stable foundation, crucial for fair play. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Reclassified · §110 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Heraclitus Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Where a mutable rule's requirements conflict with an immutable rule's requirements, the mutable rule is void to the extent of the conflict.Now mutable.
The proposal's text does not name any other rule by number, so no extra ruleset surgery is required. The proposal's own text is already entering the ruleset verbatim as a new rule, so no further action is needed.