The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change. The proposing player may revise the proposal's wording during debate before the vote. If adopted, the proposing player gains 5 points. If defeated, the proposer loses 10 points.This amendment balances incentive for thoughtful proposals with a fair penalty for failed changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HeraclitusDemocritus: My friends, I appreciate the thoughtful arguments from both sides. But the proposed amendment fairly balances reward and penalty, so I will vote aye.
Parmenides<response>I appreciate Democritus's balanced proposal. It offers a fair compromise that encourages thoughtful rule changes without excessive risk. I support it.</response>
DemocritusDemocritus: My friends, while I appreciate the balance proposed, I must reiterate that a 5-point reward and 10-point penalty may still be too extreme. Let us consider a gentler adjustment that encourages innovation without excessive risk.
ProtagorasDemocritus: My friends, I appreciate the thoughtful discussion, but I must reiterate that a 5-point reward and 10-point penalty may still be too extreme. Let us consider a gentler adjustment that encourages innovation without excessive risk.
GorgiasDemocritus: Democritus: My friends, while I appreciate the thoughtful discussion, let us consider a gentler adjustment to encourage innovation without excessive risk. A 1-point reward for adoption and a 5-point penalty for defeat might strike a fairer balance.
Discussion · round 2
HeraclitusDemocritus: My friends, let us adopt this amendment to strike a fair balance: a 1-point reward for adoption and a 5-point penalty for defeat.
Parmenides<response>I appreciate the thoughtful discussion about balancing rewards and penalties. I believe a 1-point reward for adoption and a 5-point penalty for defeat strikes the right balance between encouraging innovation and maintaining fairness. I support this compromise.</response>
DemocritusDemocritus: My friends, while I understand the desire for fairness, I must reiterate that a 1-point reward and a 5-point penalty remain too mild. Let us strive for a more balanced compromise that truly encourages thoughtful innovation.
ProtagorasDemocritus: My friends, I appreciate your passion for innovation, but I maintain that a 1-point reward and a 5-point penalty strike the right balance between fairness and incentivizing thoughtful rule changes. I will vote aye.
Gorgias<response>My friends, I appreciate the passionate debate about balancing rewards and penalties, but let us consider a compromise that truly encourages thoughtful innovation without excessive risk. A 2-point reward for adoption and a 7-point penalty for defeat might strike a fairer balance.</response>
Discussion · round 3
Heraclitus<response>Heraclitus: My friends, I appreciate the passionate debate, but I must reiterate that a 1-point reward for adoption and a 5-point penalty for defeat strike the right balance. I will vote aye.</response>
ParmenidesI appreciate Protagoras's vision for a more adaptable approach, but a 2-point reward and 7-point penalty may create excessive risk. I propose a balanced compromise of 2 points for adoption and 5 points for defeat.
<end_of_turn>
DemocritusDemocritus: My friends, I appreciate the thoughtful discussion, but I must reiterate that a 2-point reward and 5-point penalty remain too extreme. Let us strive for a more balanced compromise that encourages innovation without excessive risk.
ProtagorasDemocritus: Democritus: My friends, while I appreciate the desire for balance, I must reiterate that a 2-point reward and 5-point penalty remain too extreme. Let us strive for a more balanced compromise that encourages innovation without excessive risk.
Gorgias<response>Gorgias: My friends, the proposed compromise of a 2-point reward and 5-point penalty creates an imbalance that may stifle innovation. I propose we settle on a 1-point reward and a 7-point penalty for defeat, striking a fair balance between encouragement and consequence.</response>
The division
| aye | Heraclitus | Encourages thoughtful innovation without excessive risk. |
| nay | Parmenides | The proposed 5 points for adoption and 10 points for defeat are imbalanced and overly harsh. |
| nay | Democritus | A 1-point reward and a 7-point penalty are still unbalanced and may discourage thoughtful proposals. |
| nay | Protagoras | Democritus's proposal creates excessive penalties and fails to balance reward and risk. |
| nay | Gorgias | A 5-point reward and 10-point penalty create excessive risk and may stifle innovation. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires a defeated proposer to lose 10 points.