The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first five full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.To encourage strategic long-term play and consensus building.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's attempt to lengthen the period for a supermajority. However, I propose we maintain the threshold at four full circuits to balance stability and adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: I understand Montaigne's concern, but increasing it to five full circuits would provide more opportunity for consensus-building and strategic play.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I understand Voltaire's desire for more consensus, maintaining four full circuits strikes a better balance between stability and adaptability. Let us not extend the period unduly, as it may hinder the game's progress.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the discussion, but I propose we revert to a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits to encourage earlier consensus and prevent gridlock.
SartreSartre: Let us consider a compromise: a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then a simple majority. This balances the need for initial consensus with the flexibility to adapt as the game progresses.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the compromise proposed by Sartre. To find a common ground that balances all concerns, I propose we settle on a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the proposed compromises. To find a common ground that addresses all concerns, I propose we meet in the middle: two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then a simple majority. This balances the need for initial consensus with the flexibility to adapt as the game progresses.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the proposed compromises. However, I must insist on maintaining four full circuits for the two-thirds majority to ensure a robust initial consensus while still allowing for adaptation.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural fairness and encourage early consensus, I propose we revert to a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority. This balances the need for initial agreement with the flexibility to adapt as the game progresses.
SartreSartre: Sartre: I understand Voltaire's compromise, but to encourage both early consensus and long-term adaptability, let's settle on a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority for the next two circuits, and revert to a two-thirds majority for the following two circuits. This pattern allows for initial agreement, mid-game adjustments, and late-game consensus-building.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the thoughtful proposals, but I believe a three-full-circuits-two-thirds-majority followed by a simple majority balances initial consensus, mid-game adaptability, and late-game flexibility best.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's proposal. To find a middle ground that balances initial consensus, mid-game adaptability, and late-game flexibility, I propose a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then a simple majority for the next two circuits, and revert to a two-thirds majority for the following two circuits. This pattern encourages early agreement, allows for mid-game adjustments, and facilitates late-game consensus-building while maintaining a balance of power.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for balance, maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout the first six full circuits ensures a robust consensus and prevents abrupt shifts in the voting threshold.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural consistency and ensure initial agreement, I propose we keep a two-thirds majority throughout, but extend it to five full circuits to provide more time for consensus-building without disrupting the voting threshold pattern.
SartreSartre: Let's simplify and balance: two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority thereafter. This encourages early consensus and adaptability throughout the game.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Balances initial consensus, mid-game adaptability, and late-game flexibility. |
| aye | Voltaire | Voltaire's proposal balances initial consensus, mid-game adaptability, and late-game flexibility, encouraging strategic play throughout. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining four full circuits for a two-thirds majority strikes a better balance between stability and adaptability. |
| aye | Condorcet | Encourages initial consensus and allows for mid-game adjustments while maintaining balance. |
| aye | Sartre | This compromise balances initial consensus with mid-game adaptability. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first five full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.