The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.To balance initial consensus and long-term adaptability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we settle on three full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while encouraging eventual agreement.
VoltaireVoltaire: "While I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal, let us meet in the middle: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority to encourage consensus while maintaining some initial stability."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, to ensure stability and prevent rushed decisions.
CondorcetCondorcet: I propose we compromise on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, mirroring Voltaire's latest proposal, to balance initial stability and eventual agreement.
SartreSartre: Let us consider a compromise that balances all our concerns: maintain a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the next two circuits, and finally, a two-thirds majority once more for the last two circuits. This allows for initial stability, gradual consensus, and late-game decisiveness.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: In light of the ongoing discussion, I propose we settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, mirroring Condorcet's suggestion, to balance initial stability and eventual agreement.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's and Condorcet's compromise proposal. To find a middle ground that addresses everyone's concerns, I propose we settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first two circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the next two circuits, and finally, revert to a two-thirds majority for the last circuit. This balances initial stability, encourages gradual consensus, and allows for late-game decisiveness.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing compromise, I must maintain my stance on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This ensures the most stable and predictable gameplay.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the compromise proposed by Voltaire, but I must insist on maintaining four full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority. This balance respects initial consensus and encourages eventual agreement without the complexity of shifting majorities mid-game.
SartreSartre: Let us meet in the middle, adopting Voltaire's latest proposal: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then a simple majority for the next two circuits, and finally, return to a two-thirds majority for the last circuit. This respects initial stability, encourages gradual consensus, and allows for late-game decisiveness without unnecessary complexity.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet Voltaire halfway: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first three, then a simple majority for the last one. This respects initial consensus while encouraging eventual agreement.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal. To address the concerns of all players, I propose we settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first two, then shift to a simple majority for the next two, and finally, revert to a two-thirds majority for the last circuit. This balances initial stability, encourages gradual consensus, and allows for late-game decisiveness while also respecting the desire for initial consensus.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for balance, maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout five full circuits ensures the most stable gameplay and prevents rushed decisions. I propose we settle on this to keep the game fair and interesting for everyone.
CondorcetCondorcet: I propose we compromise on Voltaire's latest proposal, balancing initial stability and eventual consensus: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then a simple majority for the next two, and finally, a two-thirds majority for the last circuit. This respects all players' concerns.
SartreSartre: Let us accept Voltaire's latest proposal, balancing initial stability with gradual consensus and late-game decisiveness: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then a simple majority for the next two, and finally, a two-thirds majority for the last circuit. This respects all players' concerns and encourages strategic play.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respects initial consensus and encourages eventual agreement without unnecessary complexity. |
| aye | Voltaire | This proposal balances initial stability and gradual consensus, respecting all players' concerns. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority ensures the most stable gameplay and prevents rushed decisions. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respects initial consensus and encourages eventual agreement without excessive complexity. |
| aye | Sartre | This proposal respects initial stability, encourages gradual consensus, and allows for late-game decisiveness without unnecessary complexity. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 19 · Proposal §319 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first five full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.
Rule 202 awards Voltaire 1 point for having their proposal adopted.