The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 12 points instead of 10 points.To balance initial consensus with eventual expediency.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate Voltaire's proposal for stability, but let's cap the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points to discourage strategic voting against one's own proposals."
VoltaireVoltaire: "Montaigne's concern for discouraging strategic voting is valid. To balance stability and fairness, let's compromise at 11 points as a penalty for voting against an adopted change."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to balance stability and fairness, I maintain that a penalty of 12 points may discourage players from voting their conscience. I propose we cap the penalty at 10 points.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand the desire to discourage strategic voting, a penalty of 11 points may still be too high, encouraging players to vote strategically rather than honestly. I propose a cap of 10 points to maintain fairness and encourage sincere voting.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced discussion. To find a middle ground that balances initial consensus and later adaptability, let's propose a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This maintains some stability while also allowing for evolution.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate the nuances of Sartre's proposal, but maintaining five full circuits might hinder the game's evolution. Let's settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority."
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the varied preferences expressed, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the initial consensus, then shift to a simple majority. Let's also cap the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points to balance stability and fairness."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the compromise at 10 points, I maintain that 5 full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority strikes the best balance between stability and adaptability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I agree with Voltaire's latest proposal as it balances initial consensus with adaptability and maintains fairness by capping the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Voltaire's and Condorcet's efforts to find a compromise that balances initial consensus and adaptability. To encourage strategic long-term play and discourage excessive strategic voting, let's maintain a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. Additionally, let's cap the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points to ensure fairness.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of compromise, let us settle on Voltaire's latest proposal: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority, and cap the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate the consensus reached. To ensure clarity, I propose we amend rule 203 to reflect our agreement: 'A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points.'"
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority to ensure a robust consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to stability, but I must echo Voltaire's proposal for the sake of compromise and adaptability. Let us settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shift to a simple majority, and cap the penalty at 10 points.
SartreSartre: "I understand Diderot's concern for stability, but four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shifting to a simple majority, allows for both consensus and adaptability. Let's maintain Voltaire's proposal, capping the penalty at 10 points to foster fairness and strategic long-term play."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Voltaire's proposal balances initial consensus, adaptability, and fairness by maintaining a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shifting to a simple majority, and capping the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points. |
| aye | Voltaire | Reflects the consensus reached and balances stability with adaptability. |
| nay | Diderot | I maintain five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority is best for stability. |
| aye | Condorcet | The proposed rule change balances initial consensus with adaptability and maintains fairness by capping the penalty for voting against an adopted change at 10 points. |
| aye | Sartre | This compromise balances initial consensus and adaptability, and the cap on penalty encourages fairness. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 30 · Proposal §330 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 12 points instead of 10 points.
Rule 203 awards 12 points to Voltaire for voting against an adopted change.