The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first five full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a three-fifths majority.To maintain a high initial consensus and encourage long-term strategic play.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand Diderot's preference for a longer initial consensus period, I believe four full circuits strike a better balance between stability and flexibility.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority as per the current rule. This balances initial consensus with flexibility."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromises proposed, maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority ensures a more robust consensus and prevents hasty decisions.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the spirit of compromise and to maintain a balance between stability and flexibility, I propose we meet in the middle: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a three-fifths majority.
SartreSartre: While I respect Diderot's emphasis on stability, I propose we meet Voltaire and Condorcet in the middle: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a three-fifths majority. This balances initial consensus with adaptability to changing dynamics.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the proposed compromises. To address the concerns of all players, I propose we settle on Condorcet's latest proposal: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a three-fifths majority.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate the consensus around four full circuits. To address Diderot's concern for a consistent majority, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority throughout, with no shift to simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the consensus around four full circuits, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, as it fosters more deliberate decision-making.
CondorcetCondorcet: I understand Diderot's preference for a consistent majority but to encourage adaptability and prevent gridlock, I propose a compromise: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a three-fifths majority.
SartreSartre: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet Condorcet and Voltaire halfway: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first four, then shift to a four-fifths majority to maintain a higher threshold while allowing for flexibility.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to maintaining a high threshold for initial rule changes. To balance this with adaptability, I propose a compromise: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a three-fifths majority. This preserves some stability while allowing for necessary changes.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the varied preferences expressed, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first four, then shift to a three-fifths majority to balance initial consensus with adaptability."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing compromise, I must maintain my stance on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect Diderot's preference for a longer initial consensus while encouraging adaptability, I propose a compromise: five full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a four-fifths majority. This balances robustness with flexibility.
SartreSartre: In the spirit of compromise, let's settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first four, then shift to a three-fifths majority, as proposed by Voltaire and Condorcet. This balances initial consensus with adaptability and is a fair compromise for all.
The division
| nay | Montaigne | Four circuits strike a better balance. |
| nay | Voltaire | While I respect Diderot's preference for a longer initial consensus, I believe four full circuits strike a better balance between stability and flexibility. |
| nay | Diderot | Five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority may hinder adaptability and slow progress. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respecting Diderot's preference for a longer initial consensus while encouraging adaptability. |
| nay | Sartre | Four full circuits balance stability and flexibility better than five. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.