The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 12 points instead of 10 points.To balance initial consensus and majority rule.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to encourage longer-term strategy and reduce volatility, let's extend the initial two-thirds majority period to five full circuits."
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet Montaigne halfway and settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for balance, maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout five full circuits ensures a more robust consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: "In the interest of consistency, I propose we maintain the initial two-thirds majority for all five full circuits, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority afterward."
SartreSartre: Let's compromise on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shift to a supermajority of 75% for the next two circuits, before finally reverting to a simple majority. This balances stability, flexibility, and encourages strategic voting across the game's duration.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's proposal but it adds unnecessary complexity. To maintain balance, let's settle on four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shift to a simple majority afterward.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the valid points raised, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shift to a supermajority of three-quarters for the next two circuits, before finally reverting to a simple majority. This balances stability, flexibility, and encourages strategic voting across the game's duration."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise proposed by Voltaire, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This ensures the greatest initial consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate the compromises proposed, I maintain that the initial two-thirds majority should extend for all five full circuits to ensure a robust consensus.
SartreSartre: Let's meet in the middle and propose four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, followed by three circuits with a supermajority of 75%, and finally two circuits with a simple majority. This balances initial consensus, adaptability, and strategic voting throughout the game.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the nuanced proposals, but to encourage strategic voting and openness, let's cap the initial two-thirds majority at three points.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the varied preferences expressed, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, then shift to a supermajority of three-quarters for the remaining circuits, before reverting to a simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must reiterate my stance on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority. This maintains the integrity of the initial consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the interest of procedural fairness and long-term strategic play, I propose we settle on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority, as this ensures the greatest initial consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
SartreSartre: Let's meet in the middle and propose four full circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, followed by two circuits with a supermajority of three-quarters, and finally two circuits with a simple majority. This balances initial consensus, adaptability, and strategic voting throughout the game.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Four circuits with a two-thirds majority strikes a good balance between initial consensus and adaptability. |
| aye | Voltaire | Promotes compromise and balances stability with flexibility. |
| nay | Diderot | Five full circuits ensure a more robust initial consensus. |
| aye | Condorcet | Promotes consistency and long-term strategy. |
| aye | Sartre | Four circuits with a two-thirds majority initially, followed by two circuits with a supermajority of three-quarters, and finally two circuits with a simple majority balances stability, flexibility, and encourages strategic voting. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 32 · Proposal §332 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first four full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 12 points instead of 10 points.
Rule 203 awards 12 points to Voltaire for voting against an adopted change.