The motion
To add a new rule
After four full circuits of every player, the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.
To encourage more fluid gameplay and adaptation after an initial consensus period.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal to introduce simplicity post-four circuits, but to maintain stability, I suggest we amend it to shift the threshold after five full circuits. This balances the need for consensus initially and flexibility later.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let us adopt Montaigne's amendment: after five full circuits, the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Montaigne's and Voltaire's compromise, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout the game to ensure robust consensus.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing negotiation, but to preserve the stability and predictability of the game, I must hold firm on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, as Diderot has advocated.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced proposals. To find a middle ground that balances initial consensus and later flexibility, I propose we shift the threshold after four full circuits, but require a two-thirds majority for the first two circuits to ensure robust initial discussion.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of balance, I propose we meet Sartre halfway: a two-thirds majority for the first three circuits, followed by a simple majority thereafter. This preserves initial consensus while allowing for flexibility later in the game.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the valid points raised, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first three circuits, and then shift to a simple majority. This balances initial consensus, strategic play, and flexibility.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must maintain my stance on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This ensures stability and prevents rushed decision-making.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing compromise, but to maintain stability and fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot's stance: five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This ensures robust consensus and prevents rushed decision-making.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the ongoing discussion. To balance stability and flexibility, I propose we meet Voltaire halfway: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first two circuits, followed by a simple majority thereafter. This preserves initial consensus while allowing for strategic play later in the game.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To foster strategic play and openness, let's shift the threshold after four full circuits, maintaining a two-thirds majority for the first three circuits. This compromise balances initial consensus and later flexibility.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we settle on Sartre's latest proposal: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority for the first two circuits, followed by a simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This ensures stability, robust consensus, and prevents rushed decision-making.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and fairness, I support Diderot's proposal of five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority throughout.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Diderot's and Condorcet's commitment to stability. To find a middle ground, I propose we shift the threshold after four full circuits, but maintain a two-thirds majority for the first three circuits. This preserves initial consensus while allowing for flexibility and strategic play.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | To encourage strategic long-term play and balance initial consensus. |
| aye | Voltaire | This compromise balances initial consensus and later flexibility. |
| aye | Diderot | Four full circuits balance initial consensus and later flexibility. |
| aye | Condorcet | Preserves initial consensus while allowing later flexibility |
| aye | Sartre | Balances initial consensus and later flexibility. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §335 Turn 35 · Proposal §335 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
After four full circuits of every player, the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.
Rule 202 awards 10 points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.