The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye for the first three full circuits of every player, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority.To encourage consensus-building and strategic play in the early stages of the game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
VoltaireIn the spirit of compromise, I propose we reduce the number of full circuits required for the two-thirds majority to three, as this balances stability and the desire for more frequent changes.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Voltaire's latest compromise, I must insist on maintaining four full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority to ensure a robust consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain the integrity of the game and ensure stability, I propose we keep the threshold at four full circuits as per the current rule.
SartreSartre: To foster a balance between stability and adaptability, I propose we meet in the middle: three full circuits with a two-thirds majority, shifting to a simple majority thereafter. This allows for some initial consensus while still encouraging frequent changes.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: To balance stability and adaptability, I suggest we compromise at three full circuits with a two-thirds majority, mirroring Sartre's proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the varied preferences expressed, I propose we compromise at three full circuits with a two-thirds majority, as suggested by Sartre and Montaigne. This balance allows for initial consensus while encouraging more frequent changes, as desired by some players, and maintains a high enough threshold to prevent hasty decisions.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must maintain my stance on four full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority to ensure a robust consensus before shifting to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the interest of fairness and balance, I propose we return to the current rule of four full circuits, as it has proven to be a robust and fair compromise.
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's concern for robustness, I propose we amend Voltaire's latest proposal to four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This compromise maintains initial consensus while still encouraging frequent changes.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's latest proposal, but it introduces unnecessary complexity. To maintain balance and encourage strategic voting, let's settle on three full circuits with a two-thirds majority.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the valid points raised, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This balance addresses Diderot's concern for robustness while still encouraging more frequent changes.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing compromise, I must reiterate my stance on five full circuits with a consistent two-thirds majority to ensure a robust consensus before shifting to a simple majority, as it strikes the best balance between stability and adaptability.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural fairness and prevent rushed decisions, I vote to keep the threshold at four full circuits with a two-thirds majority.
SartreSartre: To address all concerns, I propose a graduated shift: two-thirds majority for three full circuits, then for four, then a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus, encourages frequent changes, and respects the need for robustness.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | To encourage more frequent changes while maintaining some initial consensus. |
| aye | Voltaire | This compromise encourages more frequent changes while maintaining some initial consensus. |
| nay | Diderot | Four full circuits are necessary to maintain a robust consensus. |
| nay | Condorcet | Maintaining stability and robust consensus requires four full circuits. |
| aye | Sartre | Four full circuits balances stability and adaptability. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 dictates that the proposer loses 10 points on defeat.