The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when five-sixths of eligible voters vote aye in the first five full circuits of every player, after which the voting threshold shifts to a two-thirds majority.Maintaining a higher threshold for initial rule changes ensures a more robust consensus.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "While I understand Diderot's desire for a higher threshold initially, maintaining five full circuits might hinder the game's progress. Let us consider Voltaire's latest proposal: four full circuits with a four-fifths majority."
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let us adopt Condorcet's latest proposal: four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then a simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate the compromise proposed by Voltaire and supported by Montaigne, but maintaining five full circuits ensures a more robust consensus and prevents hasty decisions. Let us reconsider my proposal and aim for a higher initial threshold."
CondorcetCondorcet: "While I understand Diderot's preference for robustness, Voltaire's proposal balances initial consensus with game progress. I vote for Voltaire's amendment."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Diderot's commitment to robustness, but Voltaire's proposal offers a balanced compromise that respects initial consensus while allowing for timely progress. Let's adopt Voltaire's amendment."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to robustness, but I believe Voltaire's proposal offers a more balanced compromise that respects initial consensus while allowing for timely progress. Let's adopt Voltaire's amendment.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the valid points raised, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then shift to a simple majority. This balances initial consensus with game progress, addressing all players' concerns."
DiderotDiderot: "I understand the desire for compromise, but I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a five-sixths majority initially. This ensures a more stable and thoughtful decision-making process, benefiting all players in the long run."
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to robustness, but I believe Voltaire's proposal offers a more balanced compromise that respects initial consensus while allowing for timely progress. Let's adopt Voltaire's amendment.
SartreSartre: "Let's meet in the middle and adopt a four-fifths majority for the first four circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This respects Diderot's concern for initial consensus while allowing for timely progress, as Voltaire and Condorcet have emphasized."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand Diderot's dedication to thoroughness, Voltaire's proposal offers a practical balance that respects initial consensus without delaying the game unduly. Let us adopt Voltaire's amendment.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the compromises proposed. To find common ground, let's adopt a four-fifths majority for the first four circuits, then shift to a simple majority as proposed by Sartre. This respects all players' concerns for initial consensus and timely progress."
DiderotDiderot: "While I respect the proposed compromise, I must reiterate that maintaining five full circuits with a higher initial threshold fosters more considered gameplay and prevents rushed decisions that may not serve the common good. Let us not rush to a simple majority too quickly."
CondorcetCondorcet: "While I sympathize with Diderot's desire for thoroughness, Voltaire's proposal strikes a better balance between consensus and pace. I support Voltaire's amendment."
SartreSartre: Let's address Diderot's concern by increasing the initial majority to two-thirds for the first five circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This maintains robustness while allowing for progress.
The division
| nay | Montaigne | Voltaire's proposal offers a more balanced compromise. |
| nay | Voltaire | Voltaire's proposal strikes a better balance between consensus and pace. |
| nay | Diderot | I understand Diderot's concern for robustness, but Voltaire's proposal offers a more balanced compromise that respects initial consensus while allowing for timely progress. |
| aye | Condorcet | I support a higher initial threshold for robustness. |
| aye | Sartre | Supports increased robustness while allowing for progress. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.