The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when four-fifths of eligible voters vote aye within the first four full circuits of every player, after which the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.To balance robustness and efficiency in adopting rule changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "Voltaire's proposal strikes a good balance between robustness and pace, but let's consider a slight amendment: 'A rule change is adopted when four-fifths of eligible voters vote aye within the first five full circuits of every player, then the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.' This maintains Diderot's concern for thoroughness while encouraging strategic voting."
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I'm willing to accept Montaigne's amendment to 'five full circuits' to address Diderot's valid concern for robustness."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing compromise, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a two-thirds majority as it ensures a more robust consensus and prevents rushed decisions.
CondorcetCondorcet: "While I appreciate the ongoing debate and the compromises proposed, I must insist on maintaining four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, as it balances robustness and pace effectively."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the nuanced proposals, but to encourage strategic voting and openness, let's settle on Voltaire's latest proposal: four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then a simple majority."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "To find common ground, let's adopt Condorcet's proposal: four full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority."
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the varied preferences expressed, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then shift to a simple majority, as it balances robustness, pace, and encourages strategic voting."
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the ongoing compromises, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining five full circuits with a two-thirds majority to ensure a more robust consensus. However, I am open to negotiating the shift to a simple majority threshold.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I propose we meet Diderot halfway: five full circuits with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a four-fifths majority for the next four circuits before a simple majority takes effect. This maintains robustness while encouraging strategic voting."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Condorcet's effort to bridge the gap, but let's simplify and compromise on Voltaire's proposal: four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then a simple majority. This encourages strategic voting without overburdening the initial stages."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: "To address Diderot's concern for robustness and Condorcet's for pace, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a five-sixths majority, then shift to a simple majority."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To address all concerns, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a five-sixths majority for initial votes, then shift to a simple majority."
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I appreciate the latest compromise, I must insist on maintaining five full circuits with a two-thirds majority to ensure a robust consensus. However, I am open to negotiating the shift to a simple majority threshold.
CondorcetCondorcet: "To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we adopt Voltaire's latest compromise: four full circuits with a five-sixths majority for initial votes, then shift to a simple majority."
SartreSartre: "Considering the valid points raised, I propose we compromise at four full circuits with a four-fifths majority, then shift to a simple majority to balance robustness, pace, and strategic voting."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Voltaire's proposal balances robustness and pace effectively. |
| aye | Voltaire | Balances robustness, pace, and encourages strategic voting |
| nay | Diderot | I maintain that five full circuits with a two-thirds majority ensures a more robust consensus. |
| aye | Condorcet | This proposal balances robustness, pace, and encourages strategic voting. |
| aye | Sartre | Voltaire's proposal balances robustness, pace, and encourages strategic voting. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote aye in the first four full circuits of every player, after which the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.A rule change is adopted when four-fifths of eligible voters vote aye within the first four full circuits of every player, after which the voting threshold shifts to a simple majority.
Rule 202 awards 4 points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.