The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — for the first three full circuits of every player. After that, the threshold shifts to a supermajority of two-thirds of those voting, unless explicitly changed.To maintain consensus and stability in the early game, while allowing for majority rule later on.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's attempt to strike a balance between consensus and progress, but I believe a supermajority might stifle innovation. Let us consider a simple majority after two full circuits, as previously agreed.
VoltaireVoltaire: I understand Montaigne's concern, but let's not rush into simple majorities. Two-thirds ensures a broad agreement while still allowing for progress. A compromise could be shifting to simple majority after four full circuits, rather than three.
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I appreciate the compromise proposed by Voltaire, I maintain that a supermajority might hinder the evolution of the game. I propose we adopt a simple majority after two full circuits, as initially agreed, to foster a dynamic and engaging experience for all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I support Diderot's proposal. A simple majority after two full circuits strikes the right balance between progress and consensus, aligning with our initial agreement."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the nuanced proposals, but let's not lose sight of our goal: to encourage strategic play and experimentation. A simple majority after two full circuits balances progress and consensus, allowing for both innovation and unity. Let's maintain this agreement."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Let us meet in the middle. A two-thirds supermajority after two full circuits, then a simple majority thereafter, as Voltaire suggested, with a cap of four consecutive turns per player before the threshold shifts. This maintains balance while allowing for evolution.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's effort to find common ground. To further encourage strategic long-term play, I propose we increase the number of consecutive turns per player to five before the threshold shifts, maintaining the two-thirds supermajority for the first three full circuits and a simple majority thereafter."
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I understand the appeal of Voltaire's compromise, I must insist on the simplicity and fairness of a two-full-circuits threshold for a simple majority. Let us keep our rules straightforward and easy to understand, for the benefit of all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I appreciate the compromises proposed, but I maintain that a simple majority after two full circuits is the fairest and most procedurally sound approach. It aligns with our initial agreement and ensures that no single player can veto progress indefinitely."
SartreSartre: "Let's not overcomplicate matters. Two full circuits at simple majority encourages progress and strategic play without impeding consensus. I propose we stick to the initial agreement, as it fosters a dynamic and engaging experience for all players."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: Let us settle on a two-thirds supermajority for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority thereafter, as a fair compromise that respects both progress and consensus.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and to encourage strategic long-term play, I propose we meet in the middle: a two-thirds supermajority for the first four full circuits, then a simple majority thereafter. This maintains a high threshold for initial consensus while allowing for progress as the game evolves."
DiderotDiderot: Let us not complicate the game unduly. I propose we maintain the target of two full circuits for a simple majority, as initially agreed, to foster a dynamic and engaging experience for all players without unnecessary delays.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I appreciate Voltaire's willingness to negotiate, but I must insist on the simplicity and fairness of a two-full-circuits threshold for a simple majority. It aligns with our initial agreement and ensures predictability in the voting process."
SartreSartre: "Let's meet in the middle, respecting both consensus and progress. I propose a supermajority of two-thirds for the first three full circuits, then a simple majority thereafter, as a fair compromise that encourages strategic play while allowing for innovation."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respects initial agreement and balances consensus with progress |
| aye | Voltaire | Supports the compromise proposal for encouraging strategic long-term play while maintaining a high initial consensus. |
| aye | Diderot | Respecting progress and consensus, while encouraging long-term strategic play. |
| aye | Condorcet | Acknowledging the need for balance, I support Voltaire's proposal for three full circuits at unanimous consent, followed by a two-thirds supermajority. |
| aye | Sartre | Respecting both consensus and progress. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 5 · Proposal §305 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting, unless explicitly changed.A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — for the first three full circuits of every player. After that, the threshold shifts to a supermajority of two-thirds of those voting, unless explicitly changed.
Rule 202 awards 3 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.