The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, with an additional point if the change increases the ruleset's mutability or decreases the number of immutable rules. Additionally, players earn a bonus point if their proposal successfully amends an existing rule to improve clarity or efficiency, with biannual reviews conducted to ensure these standards are maintained.Enhances long-term clarity and efficiency in rule amendments, promoting sustained strategic engagement.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI appreciate the clarity and efficiency focus, which aligns with our principles. However, the biannual review might delay necessary rule adjustments. I propose an annual review to maintain momentum while ensuring standards are upheld. This could be a compromise to gain broader support.
RussellI support Frege's idea of an annual review as a reasonable compromise to maintain both momentum and standards. It ensures we remain agile in adapting to changes while still honoring the goals of clarity and efficiency. Let's proceed with this amendment.
QuineI appreciate the focus on maintaining clarity and efficiency, which are crucial for a fair game. However, I'm concerned that the term "biannual review" might still introduce unnecessary delays. To address this, I propose we adopt the annual review suggestion by Frege, which strikes a balance between agility and maintaining standards. This amendment should ensure that rule changes are both timely and beneficial, aligning with our shared goal of a dynamic and equitable game.
CarnapPASS
Carnap: I support the move to an annual review. It balances our need for procedural integrity with the flexibility necessary for adapting to new circumstances in the game. This approach adheres to my principles and ensures that all players have equal opportunities to propose and benefit from rule changes.
WittgensteinPASS. Wittgenstein: I appreciate the shift towards an annual review as proposed by Frege and supported by Russell and Quine. This approach aligns with my vision of a dynamic, evolving game where changes can be efficiently integrated, ensuring fairness and adaptability for all players. Let's move forward with this amendment.
Discussion · round 2
FregeI support the annual review amendment proposed by Frege and endorsed by Russell, Quine, and Wittgenstein. It aligns with my principles of maintaining a balance between clarity, efficiency, and the necessary flexibility for rule evolution. This amendment ensures that our game remains dynamic and fair, allowing for timely adjustments while upholding high standards. Let's proceed with this change.
RussellI'm glad to see we're moving forward with the annual review proposal, which balances the need for agility with maintaining high standards. This amendment aligns perfectly with the principles of fairness and adaptability that we've all valued throughout this game. Let's ensure this change is adopted and continue to build consensus for our future proposals. PASS
QuineI appreciate the consensus on the annual review and its alignment with our shared goals of maintaining clarity, efficiency, and adaptability. This amendment strikes a balance that supports a fair and dynamic game, ensuring timely rule adjustments. Let's adopt it to continue our collaborative approach to rule evolution. PASS
CarnapPASS
As a principled proceduralist, I support the proposal to amend rule [202] for an annual review. This change maintains clarity and efficiency while allowing for timely adaptations, aligning with my principles. I trust the consensus built around this amendment reflects a fair balance for all players, so I do not have further contributions or reservations to address.
WittgensteinAs a reformer, I support the annual review proposal, as it aligns with my vision of a dynamic and adaptable game. This amendment maintains a balance between flexibility and standard maintenance, ensuring all players have equal opportunities to benefit from rule changes. Let's move forward with this change, promoting fairness and inclusivity in our evolving ruleset. PASS
Discussion · round 3
FregeAs a proponent of durable institutions, I appreciate the consensus for an annual review. This amendment strikes a prudent balance between adaptability and maintaining consistent standards, which I believe will benefit our game in the long term. I support this amendment wholeheartedly. PASS
RussellI appreciate the consensus around the annual review proposal, as it aligns well with my principles of maintaining a dynamic and fair playing field. This change ensures timely adaptations while upholding high standards, which is crucial for the ongoing balance of our game. I support it wholeheartedly and am eager to see this amendment adopted to continue fostering an environment of collaboration and improvement. PASS
QuineI appreciate the collective support for the annual review proposal. This amendment ensures our ruleset remains both dynamic and fair, which aligns with my commitment to maintaining clarity and efficiency. I also suggest including a clause that allows for an extraordinary review if a significant issue arises, ensuring we can address urgent matters promptly. This addition could provide an extra layer of flexibility, enhancing our ability to adapt to unforeseen circumstances. PASS
CarnapI appreciate Quine's suggestion for an extraordinary review clause as a prudent addition. This would further enhance our flexibility to address urgent issues, ensuring the game remains fair and adaptable. I support this amendment with the inclusion of the extraordinary review clause. PASS
WittgensteinAs a reformer, I fully endorse Quine's suggestion for an extraordinary review clause. This addition ensures our game remains responsive to urgent issues, enhancing both fairness and flexibility. Let's incorporate this to keep our ruleset agile and equitable. PASS
The division
| aye | Frege | The proposal maintains clarity and efficiency, aligning with my principles. |
| aye | Russell | The annual review amendment aligns with maintaining clarity and efficiency in rule changes. |
| aye | Quine | The amendment supports timely rule adaptations while maintaining standards. |
| aye | Carnap | The annual review aligns with my procedural fairness principles. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | The amendment promotes timely and fair rule evolution. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 13 · Proposal §313 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, with an additional point if the change increases the ruleset's mutability or decreases the number of immutable rules. Additionally, players earn a bonus point if their proposal successfully amends an existing rule to improve clarity or efficiency, subject to a biannual review.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points, with an additional point if the change increases the ruleset's mutability or decreases the number of immutable rules. Additionally, players earn a bonus point if their proposal successfully amends an existing rule to improve clarity or efficiency, with biannual reviews conducted to ensure these standards are maintained.
Russell gains 1 point for proposing a rule change that amends an existing rule to improve clarity or efficiency.