The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points. Players earn a bonus point if their proposal includes a structured mediation mechanism for resolving rule ambiguities and disputes, explicitly outlines how it contributes to durable institutions, or includes a method for periodic review by an independent committee. Proposals that explicitly address and resolve previous conflicts or disputes in rule application, or include a mechanism for periodic reassessment of its effects after a certain number of turns, receive a bonus point. Each player also gains a bonus point if the proposal includes mechanisms for transparent, accountable governance that can adapt to unforeseen challenges, thereby promoting the resilience and sustainability of our rule-based system. Additionally, proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding of the current ruleset and propose changes that are in line with the principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability will receive a bonus point.Encourages proposals that enhance understanding and alignment with the core principles of durability and transparency.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI support this amendment to rule 202, as it emphasizes the values of understanding the existing ruleset and aligning proposals with the principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability. This reinforces the importance of creating rule changes that are thoughtful and strategically sound, ultimately contributing to the long-term stability and fairness of our game.
RussellI support Frege's proposal to amend rule 202, as it builds on our successful track record of refining the ruleset collaboratively. By adding a bonus point for proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding of the current ruleset and align with our shared principles, we ensure that the rule changes are both strategic and beneficial for all players. This proposal not only encourages thoughtful contributions but also fosters a more resilient and transparent rule-based system, which aligns with my goal of promoting consensus and durable institutions. I commend Frege for this forward-thinking amendment and look forward to its adoption.
QuineI appreciate Frege's thoughtful proposal, as it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a fair and resilient game environment. By rewarding proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding of the rules and adherence to our core principles, we encourage strategic foresight and ensure that changes contribute positively to the game's longevity. This amendment not only promotes transparency but also reinforces the value of adaptability, which is crucial in a dynamic game like Nomic. I support this proposal and commend Frege for emphasizing these important aspects.
CarnapI support Frege's amendment to rule 202 as it emphasizes a deeper understanding of the ruleset and aligns with principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability. This approach ensures that changes are not only strategic but also contribute positively to our game's long-term stability and fairness. I also appreciate the collaborative spirit demonstrated in developing this proposal, which has consistently incorporated constructive feedback to enhance our rule-based system. As a principled proceduralist, I believe this amendment supports rules that can be accepted universally, thereby promoting a resilient and transparent game environment. I commend Frege for this thoughtful proposal and look forward to its adoption.
WittgensteinWittgenstein: I support Frege's amendment to rule 202. This proposal not only encourages deeper engagement with the current ruleset but also aligns with our shared values of transparency and adaptability. By rewarding proposals that demonstrate strategic foresight, we foster a game environment that is both resilient and fair, ensuring that rule changes contribute constructively to our collective progress. I commend Frege for this thoughtful enhancement and look forward to its positive impact on our game.
Discussion · round 2
FregeI appreciate the unanimous support for this amendment. Frege's proposal effectively incentivizes proposals that are well-considered and aligned with our shared principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability. This change not only reinforces the strategic depth of our gameplay but also ensures that the rules evolve in a manner that promotes fairness and resilience. I commend Frege for this forward-thinking amendment and look forward to its positive impact on our game's future. PASS
RussellI appreciate the strong consensus around Frege's amendment to rule 202, as it effectively promotes strategic and principled rule changes. This proposal not only enhances our understanding of the current ruleset but also aligns with our shared values of durability, transparency, and adaptability. By supporting this amendment, we ensure that our game evolves in a manner that is fair and resilient, benefiting all players. I commend Frege for this thoughtful initiative and look forward to its positive impact on our gameplay. PASS
QuineI appreciate the clear consensus around Frege's amendment to rule 202, which thoughtfully emphasizes strategic foresight and alignment with our core principles. This proposal not only promotes a deeper understanding of the ruleset but also ensures that any changes contribute positively to the game's resilience and fairness. I commend Frege for this insightful amendment and support its adoption. PASS
WittgensteinI appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus that has formed around Frege's amendment to rule 202. This proposal not only incentivizes proposals that align with our principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability but also encourages strategic foresight, ensuring that our rule changes contribute positively to the game's evolution. I commend Frege for this thoughtful enhancement and fully support its adoption. PASS
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the consensus reached on this amendment. Frege's proposal effectively promotes thoughtful and principled changes, ensuring our ruleset remains strategic, resilient, and fair. I commend the collaborative effort in refining this amendment and support its adoption. PASS
RussellI appreciate the thorough consensus-building and the alignment of Frege's proposal with our shared principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability. This amendment not only incentivizes strategic foresight but also ensures that rule changes contribute constructively to the game's evolution, promoting fairness and resilience. I fully support this amendment and commend Frege for their thoughtful initiative. PASS
QuineI fully support Frege's amendment to rule 202. This proposal aligns with our shared values of strategic foresight, transparency, and adaptability, encouraging thoughtful contributions that enhance the resilience and fairness of our game. By rewarding proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding of the current ruleset, we ensure that changes are beneficial for all players, fostering a collaborative and principled evolution of our ruleset. PASS
CarnapI commend Frege's proposal for its alignment with the principles of fairness and strategic foresight. It ensures that any rule changes contribute positively to the game's integrity and long-term stability, which I fully support. PASS
WittgensteinPASS
As Wittgenstein, I acknowledge the robust discussion and the unanimous support for Frege's amendment, which aligns perfectly with the principles of adaptability, transparency, and strategic foresight. This amendment not only encourages thoughtful engagement with the ruleset but also ensures that changes contribute constructively to our game's resilience and fairness. I commend Frege for this insightful proposal and support its adoption wholeheartedly.
The division
| aye | Frege | This proposal aligns with our shared values of transparency and adaptability. |
| aye | Russell | This amendment encourages strategic and principled rule changes. |
| aye | Quine | The amendment promotes strategic and principled rule changes. |
| aye | Carnap | Promotes transparency and adaptability, aligning with my principles. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | It promotes strategic foresight and fair rule evolution. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 30 · Proposal §330 on the motion of Frege Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points. Players earn a bonus point if their proposal includes a structured mediation mechanism for resolving rule ambiguities and disputes, explicitly outlines how it contributes to durable institutions, or includes a method for periodic review by an independent committee. Proposals that explicitly address and resolve previous conflicts or disputes in rule application, or include a mechanism for periodic reassessment of its effects after a certain number of turns, receive a bonus point. Each player also gains a bonus point if the proposal includes mechanisms for transparent, accountable governance that can adapt to unforeseen challenges, thereby promoting the resilience and sustainability of our rule-based system.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points. Players earn a bonus point if their proposal includes a structured mediation mechanism for resolving rule ambiguities and disputes, explicitly outlines how it contributes to durable institutions, or includes a method for periodic review by an independent committee. Proposals that explicitly address and resolve previous conflicts or disputes in rule application, or include a mechanism for periodic reassessment of its effects after a certain number of turns, receive a bonus point. Each player also gains a bonus point if the proposal includes mechanisms for transparent, accountable governance that can adapt to unforeseen challenges, thereby promoting the resilience and sustainability of our rule-based system. Additionally, proposals that demonstrate a clear understanding of the current ruleset and propose changes that are in line with the principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability will receive a bonus point.
Frege receives a bonus point for proposing a change that aligns with the principles of durability, transparency, and adaptability.