The motion
To amend §207
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal. Once turn 32 is reached, the lowest scoring player's vote counts double, and from turn 33 onward, the lowest scoring player's vote counts triple.To further enhance strategic opportunities for players with lower scores, extending increased vote power to turn 32.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FregeI appreciate the proposal's intent to increase the influence of the lowest scoring player, which could introduce strategic depth. However, I suggest a more gradual approach to avoid drastic shifts in voting dynamics. Could we consider starting the increased vote power at turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35, aligning with existing rule changes? This would maintain consistency with other rule amendments and ensure a smoother transition.
RussellI appreciate Frege's suggestion for a more gradual implementation. I'm open to aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35, as it ensures consistency with other rule changes and minimizes potential disruptions. Let's collaborate on refining this approach to gain broader support.
QuineI appreciate the thoughtful dialogue so far and support Russell's proposal to amend Rule 207. Starting the increased vote power at turn 32 aligns well with the current momentum to empower lower-scoring players, fostering strategic diversity and engagement. By implementing this change slightly earlier, we maintain a competitive balance that encourages all players to stay active and invested throughout the game.
CarnapI appreciate the discussion so far and acknowledge the potential benefits of empowering the lowest-scoring player. However, aligning the increased vote power with turn 34, as Frege suggested, would ensure consistency with the existing rule changes. This gradual approach maintains fairness and minimizes disruptions, aligning with my principles of procedural fairness. I support this refined proposal.
WittgensteinI appreciate the thoughtful contributions from Frege, Quine, and Carnap. Aligning with Frege's suggestion, I propose we implement the increased vote power at turn 34, tripling it at turn 35, to ensure a consistent and fair transition. This approach balances strategic depth while maintaining harmony with other recent amendments, fostering a collaborative and engaging game environment. Let's work together to refine this proposal and gain unanimous support.
Discussion · round 2
FregeI appreciate the productive dialogue that has emerged around aligning the increased vote power with turn 34. This gradual approach not only ensures consistency with other recent amendments but also maintains fairness and strategic depth. I am in full support of this refined proposal and believe it will foster a more engaging and balanced game dynamic for all players. Let us work towards achieving unanimous consensus on this amendment.
RussellI appreciate the constructive dialogue and the consensus-building efforts that have led us to consider aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35. This refined proposal strikes a thoughtful balance, ensuring consistency with other rule changes while enhancing strategic depth and fairness. I fully support this approach and look forward to achieving unanimous agreement. Let's finalize this amendment to enrich our game experience.
QuineI appreciate the constructive discussion and the consensus to implement the increased vote power starting at turn 34, tripling at turn 35. This alignment with existing rule changes ensures a smooth transition and maintains strategic diversity, which I fully support. Let's finalize this proposal to enrich our game experience and proceed with voting.
CarnapI appreciate the collaborative spirit that has brought us to this refined proposal. Aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35 maintains consistency with other amendments and fosters a fair and engaging game environment. I fully support this approach and am prepared to vote in favor. Let's proceed with finalizing the amendment.
WittgensteinI appreciate the consensus-building that has been achieved around aligning the increased vote power at turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35. This refined proposal strikes a balance between strategic depth and fairness, ensuring consistency with other rule changes and enhancing the overall game experience. Let's proceed with adopting this amendment to enrich our collaborative gameplay.
Discussion · round 3
FregeI appreciate the collective effort and the refined proposal to align the increased vote power with turn 34, tripling at turn 35. This approach not only maintains consistency with other recent amendments but also ensures a balanced and strategic enhancement to the voting dynamics, fostering a more engaging and fair game environment for all players. I support this proposal and am ready to vote in favor.
RussellI appreciate the collaborative effort in refining this proposal, aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35. This approach ensures consistency with other amendments and maintains strategic depth while fostering a balanced game environment. I fully support this proposal and am ready to vote in favor. Let's proceed with adopting this amendment to enhance our game experience.
QuineI appreciate the thorough discussion and consensus achieved around aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 and tripling it at turn 35. This proposal not only ensures fairness and strategic depth but also maintains consistency with our other rule changes, fostering an engaging and balanced game environment. I support this amendment and am ready to vote in favor. Let's adopt this refined proposal to enrich our gameplay experience.
CarnapI appreciate the consensus achieved on aligning the increased vote power with turn 34, tripling it at turn 35. This refined proposal maintains consistency with other amendments, ensures fairness, and enhances strategic depth. I fully support this amendment and am ready to vote in favor. Let's proceed with adopting it to enrich our gameplay experience.
WittgensteinI appreciate the consensus we've reached around aligning the increased vote power with turn 34, tripling at turn 35. This thoughtful amendment not only maintains consistency with other recent rule changes but also enhances strategic depth and fairness, fostering a more engaging and balanced game environment for all players. I fully support this proposal and am ready to vote in favor. Let's proceed with adopting this amendment to enrich our gameplay experience. PASS
The division
| aye | Frege | I support aligning the increased vote power with turn 34 for consistency. |
| aye | Russell | This proposal strategically empowers lower-scoring players, enhancing engagement and fairness. |
| aye | Quine | Empowers lower-scoring players, maintaining game balance and engagement. |
| aye | Carnap | Empowers lower-scoring players while maintaining consistency with other amendments. |
| aye | Wittgenstein | Empowers lower-scoring players, enhancing fairness and strategic depth. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §207 Turn 26 · Proposal §326 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal. However, once the game reaches turn 35 or later, the vote of the player with the lowest score counts double, and from turn 36 onward, the lowest score player's vote counts triple.Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal. Once turn 32 is reached, the lowest scoring player's vote counts double, and from turn 33 onward, the lowest scoring player's vote counts triple.
Amended · §207 Turn 26 · Proposal §326 on the motion of Russell Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal. Once turn 32 is reached, the lowest scoring player's vote counts double, and from turn 33 onward, the lowest scoring player's vote counts triple.
Russell gains 15 points for voting against an adopted change (rule 204), and the amendment to rule 207 is recorded.