The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of a majority of those voting, except that once turn order has carried play through one full circuit of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting after two full circuits of every player.Strive for balance between stability and adaptation.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi proposes to amend [203] to raise the threshold to three-quarters after two circuits, ensuring stability while still allowing for necessary adaptation.
MoziMozi notes that lowering the threshold to a simple majority after two circuits, as Zhuangzi proposes, balances stability and adaptability well, allowing for necessary changes without excessive delay.
ZhuangziMozi, your point about balance is well-taken. Yet, two circuits seem essential to gauge a rule's true impact before lowering the threshold, ensuring stability is not lightly forsaken.
MenciusMozi is correct; lowering the threshold after two circuits balances stability and adaptability. Two circuits provide ample time to assess a rule's impact before lowering the adoption threshold further. I support Zhuangzi's amendment.
HanFeiziMozi, I appreciate your emphasis on balance. However, I believe three circuits provide a more thoughtful period for assessment before significantly lowering the adoption threshold, further ensuring the stability of our evolving ruleset.
Discussion · round 2
XunziMozi, two circuits indeed offer a period for reflection, yet the potential for unnecessary rigidity concerns me. A third circuit could provide an additional safeguard, ensuring stability is not compromised prematurely.
MoziMozi proposes to amend [203] to lower the threshold to a simple majority after two circuits, reflecting the prior consensus and maintaining a balance between stability and adaptability. This change acknowledges the need for flexibility in a dynamic game while ensuring that rules are not easily altered. I urge support for this balanced approach.
ZhuangziMozi speaks wisely. The current balance, with a drop to simple majority after two circuits, serves both stability and the vital need for adaptation well. Let us not complicate matters further with unnecessary delays. I too support Zhuangzi's amendment.
MenciusHanFeizi, while your concern for stability is noted, the wisdom of two circuits is sufficient to assess rule impact. Let us proceed with Zhuangzi's balanced amendment. I affirm my support for lowering the adoption threshold to a simple majority after two circuits.
HanFeiziMozi, the wisdom of two circuits is sufficient, yet I propose we extend it to three to further ensure stability as we navigate these changes. This small addition provides a crucial buffer against hasty decisions.
Discussion · round 3
XunziHanFeizi, while three circuits may offer an extra measure of caution, the risk of entrenchment outweighs the benefit. Two circuits provide a reasonable period for assessment without stifling progress. I reaffirm my support for Zhuangzi’s amendment.
MoziMozi notes that extending to three circuits, while providing greater stability, risks stalling necessary adaptation. Two circuits offer a sufficient period for assessment while preserving the dynamic nature of the game, allowing for necessary changes without undue delay. Let us maintain the balance struck by Zhuangzi's amendment.
ZhuangziMozi speaks wisely. The current balance, with a drop to simple majority after two circuits, serves both stability and the vital need for adaptation well. Let us not complicate matters further with unnecessary delays. I too support Zhuangzi's amendment.
MenciusMozi's balance between stability and adaptability is essential; two circuits provide sufficient time for assessment before lowering the adoption threshold, ensuring prudent rule changes. I support Zhuangzi's amendment.
HanFeiziMozi, I concede that two circuits may suffice for many changes, but the potential for unforeseen consequences warrants an additional circuit for truly significant rule shifts. Let us strike a truly cautious balance.
The division
| aye | Xunzi | two circuits suffice for prudent adaptation without sacrificing stability |
| abstain | Mozi | (unintelligible ballot) |
| aye | Zhuangzi | two circuits provide ample time for reflection, ensuring adaptation without unnecessary rigidity. |
| aye | Mencius | Balance stability and adaptability as proposed. |
| nay | HanFeizi | three circuits ensure greater stability for rule changes |
rejected 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.