The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of a majority of those voting, except that once turn order has carried play through one full circuit of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting after two full circuits of every player.Maintain the existing consensus on the two-circuit structure while ensuring the drop to simple majority after two circuits.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziMozi, the current structure of two circuits before dropping the threshold already balances stability with adaptation, as Mencius and I have consistently argued. Further changes risk disrupting this essential harmony.
MoziMozi: I acknowledge Xunzi's point about harmony, yet I propose refining the compromise to three circuits before dropping the majority threshold, ensuring a fair balance between stability and adaptation.
ZhuangziXunzi speaks wisely of harmony, yet the river carves its path through stone not by refusing the stone, but by flowing around it. Three circuits allow ample time for reflection, preserving stability while still enabling necessary adaptation.
MenciusXunzi, the river's wisdom lies in its adaptation, yet too rigid a path risks blocking its flow entirely. Three circuits ensure ample reflection, preserving stability while still enabling necessary adaptation.
HanFeiziXunzi, the river of change needs more time to navigate the stones of stability; three circuits allow wisdom to accumulate, ensuring adaptations are well-considered.
Discussion · round 2
XunziMozi and Zhuangzi rightly emphasize the value of experience, yet three circuits before dropping the threshold respects stability without stifling necessary adaptation. I will support this amendment.
MoziI appreciate Xunzi's support and the spirit of compromise. A three-circuit delay before dropping the majority threshold indeed strikes a fair balance, ensuring both stability and the necessary adaptability for future rounds. I will vote in favor of this amendment.
ZhuangziXunzi, the wisdom of three circuits reflects the deep pools of experience gathered, allowing the current of change to flow thoughtfully around the obstacles of rigidity. I too support this amendment.
MenciusXunzi is right, the current structure is well-balanced. Three circuits may offer more caution, but the wisdom of experience is profound. I support Mozi's amendment to three circuits.
HanFeiziXunzi, three circuits allow for the wisdom of experience to truly accumulate, ensuring that adaptations are not just quick reactions but well-considered evolutions of our game. I will support this amendment to three circuits.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi: While the wisdom of experience is profound, three circuits risk stifling necessary adaptation. A measured approach, like two circuits, maintains stability while still allowing timely adjustments to changing circumstances.
MoziMozi: I see Xunzi's point, yet the wisdom gathered over three circuits ensures adaptations are well-considered, preserving the game's vitality. I urge a vote in favor of this balanced approach.
ZhuangziZunzi observes that the current structure, with a drop to simple majority after two circuits, already offers a thoughtful balance. Extending to three circuits may provide additional caution but risks diminishing the dynamic flow necessary for the game's evolution. Let us not stifle adaptation in the name of stability. PASS
MenciusXunzi is right to caution against over-caution, yet the wisdom of three circuits ensures adaptations are well-considered, preserving the game's vitality. I urge a vote in favor of this balanced approach.
HanFeiziXunzi, while three circuits offer more caution, the wisdom of experience is profound. Let us embrace three circuits to ensure adaptations are well-considered, preserving the game's vitality and fair play. I will support this amendment.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | three circuits risk stifling adaptation |
| aye | Mozi | balances stability and adaptation |
| aye | Zhuangzi | three circuits preserve stability while enabling thoughtful adaptation |
| aye | Mencius | Three circuits preserve stability without stifling adaptation. |
| aye | HanFeizi | three circuits allow for more considered adaptation |
rejected 4 aye · 1 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated rule change to lose 10 points.