The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted.To maintain initial consensus while allowing for progress.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's consistency in maintaining a high threshold for initial rule changes. However, to encourage more frequent evolution of our rules, I propose we amend rule 203 to require a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, after which the threshold shifts to a simple majority. This balances stability with adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: While I appreciate Montaigne's concern for adaptability, I suggest a compromise: maintain a two-thirds majority for the first five circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This provides more time for consensus while still allowing for evolution.
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate both Montaigne's and Voltaire's concerns, but I must insist on maintaining a high threshold of at least three-quarters for the entire duration of the game to preserve stability.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the spirit of maintaining our principles of procedural justice, I propose we amend rule 203 to require a three-quarters majority for the first five full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This allows for initial consensus while still permitting adaptability.
SartreI appreciate the discussion thus far. To find a balance between stability and adaptability, I propose we amend rule 203 to require a three-quarters majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This compromise incorporates the valid concerns of maintaining initial consensus while still allowing for evolution.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "Considering the strong points made for both stability and adaptability, let's indeed meet in the middle: maintain a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This compromise incorporates the valid concerns of all parties."
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let's adopt Montaigne's latest proposal, maintaining a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shifting to a simple majority. This balance respects both the need for stability and the desire for evolution."
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining the current three-quarters majority for the entire game to ensure durability of our institutions.
CondorcetCondorcet: Maintaining a high threshold for the entire game ensures the stability and longevity of our institutions. I stand by my proposal of a three-quarters majority for the first five full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This provides sufficient time for initial consensus while still allowing for necessary adaptability.
SartreSartre: Considering the target score is 100 points, let's adapt the voting threshold to reflect the urgency of the game's end. I propose we amend rule 203 to require a three-quarters majority for the first three full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This encourages initial consensus while also allowing for necessary adjustments as we approach the finish.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the nuanced discussion, but to maintain a durable threshold and preserve initial support, I propose we amend rule 203 to require a two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This balance respects both stability and adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the target score is within reach, let's meet in the middle and adopt Sartre's proposal, maintaining a three-quarters majority for the first three full circuits, then shifting to a simple majority. This respects the need for initial consensus and allows for necessary adjustments as we approach the finish."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to adapt the voting threshold to the game's end, I must insist on maintaining a three-quarters majority throughout to ensure the stability and longevity of our institutions.
CondorcetCondorcet: To preserve our principles of procedural justice and allow for necessary adaptability, I propose we amend rule 203 to require a three-quarters majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This compromise respects both stability and evolution.
SartreSartre: Considering the target score is near, let's further adapt the voting threshold. I propose we amend rule 203 to require a two-thirds majority for the first two full circuits, then shift to a simple majority. This encourages initial consensus while allowing for necessary adjustments in the home stretch.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Voltaire's proposal balances stability and adaptability, and I appreciate the compromise made. |
| aye | Voltaire | Voltaire's proposal strikes a good balance between stability and adaptability, respecting the target score's proximity. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining stability is crucial, and a two-thirds majority for only the first two circuits may lead to premature changes. |
| nay | Condorcet | Maintaining a higher threshold ensures the stability and longevity of our institutions. |
| aye | Sartre | This proposal strikes a good balance between stability and adaptability, and its urgency is appropriate given our proximity to the target score. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 dictates that the proposer loses 10 points upon a proposal's defeat.