The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted.
To balance stability and adaptability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain a durable threshold and preserve initial consensus, I propose we cap the voting threshold at three-quarters majority once the first rule change is adopted. This balances adaptability with the need for broad support.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise, let's meet in the middle and adopt Montaigne's proposal with a slight modification: cap the voting threshold at three-fifths majority once the first rule change is adopted, allowing for more adaptability as the game progresses. PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining a two-thirds majority throughout the game to ensure stability and prevent sudden, radical changes. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the balance sought, but to maintain fairness and ensure each player's voice is heard equally, I propose we maintain a simple majority voting threshold throughout the game, with no shift to a higher threshold after the first rule change is adopted.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the debate. To promote evolution while respecting initial consensus, I propose we adopt a two-thirds majority for the first ten turns, shifting to a simple majority thereafter. This encourages early compromise without stifling later adaptability. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the strong arguments for both stability and adaptability, let's indeed meet in the middle with Sartre's proposal: two-thirds majority for the first ten turns, then a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while allowing for evolution.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and considering the proximity to the target score, I propose we amend Sartre's suggestion to a two-thirds majority for the first fifteen turns, then a simple majority. This balances initial consensus and late-game adaptability."
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining a two-thirds majority throughout the game to ensure stability and prevent sudden, radical changes. I propose we amend Sartre's suggestion to maintain this threshold throughout, with no shift to a simple majority.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand the desire for adaptability, maintaining a two-thirds majority throughout the game ensures fairness and prevents sudden, radical changes. I propose we adopt Diderot's suggestion with a slight modification: maintain a two-thirds majority until the target score is reached, then shift to a simple majority to facilitate end-game decisions.
SartreSartre: Let's adapt Voltaire's proposal, making it a two-thirds majority for the first twenty turns, then a simple majority. This allows for more adaptability as the game progresses while still preserving initial consensus.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the strong arguments for both stability and adaptability, let's indeed meet in the middle with Sartre's latest proposal: two-thirds majority for the first twenty turns, then a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while allowing for late-game evolution.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let's adopt Sartre's latest proposal with a slight modification: cap the voting threshold at three-fifths majority once the first rule change is adopted, allowing for more adaptability as the game progresses while still respecting initial consensus." PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining a two-thirds majority throughout the game to ensure stability and prevent sudden, radical changes. I propose we amend Sartre's latest suggestion to a two-thirds majority until the target score is reached, then shift to a simple majority for the final decision.
CondorcetCondorcet: To preserve procedural fairness and respect all players' voices, I propose we maintain a simple majority voting threshold throughout the game, with no shift to a higher threshold after the first rule change is adopted.
SartreSartre: Let's adopt Voltaire's latest proposal, capping the voting threshold at three-fifths majority once the first rule change is adopted. This balance respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary adaptability as we approach the target score. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Maintains balance between stability and adaptability. |
| aye | Voltaire | Balances initial consensus with late-game adaptability. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining stability and initial consensus is crucial throughout the game. |
| nay | Condorcet | Maintaining a two-thirds majority ensures stability and prevents sudden changes, which aligns with my proceduralist principles. |
| aye | Sartre | Voltaire's proposal strikes a fair balance between initial consensus and late-game adaptability. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on a defeated proposal.