The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted. Players who voted against an adopted change gain 10 points and remain bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.To balance initial consensus with adaptability as the game progresses.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I maintain that a consistent two-thirds majority is crucial for maintaining durable institutions. Let's not shift the threshold prematurely.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the target score is within reach, let's meet in the middle and maintain two-thirds majority initially, with a shift to a simple majority once two-thirds of players support the change.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game for stability and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the spirit of fairness and maintaining procedural integrity, I suggest we keep the threshold at two-thirds throughout, reflecting the need for broad consensus on rule changes.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the discussions so far. To balance stability and adaptability, let's amend rule 203 to maintain a two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch towards the target score.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's refined proposal. To maintain our durable institutions, let's require a two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let's meet in the middle: maintain two-thirds majority for the first five full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch, as proposed by Montaigne and Sartre."
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game for fairness and predictability.
CondorcetCondorcet: Maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout promotes fairness and stability, which are principles I hold dear. I suggest we keep this threshold unchanged.
SartreSartre: Let's compromise on six full circuits at two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority to encourage flexibility in the final stretch.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering Sartre's proposal, I suggest we compromise on five full circuits at two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch to balance stability and adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To find common ground, let's adopt Sartre's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for the first six full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch."
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game to ensure fairness and prevent sudden shifts in power dynamics.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the interest of preserving fairness and consistency, I propose a two-thirds majority throughout the game, with a caveat: if a rule change proposes to lower this threshold, it must be supported by at least four-fifths of eligible voters.
SartreSartre: Let's meet in the middle and maintain two-thirds majority for the first four full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the final stretch, as proposed by Montaigne and myself.
The division
| nay | Montaigne | Consistency is key to durable institutions. |
| aye | Voltaire | To encourage adaptability in the final stretch while maintaining initial stability. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold ensures fairness and stability throughout the game. |
| nay | Condorcet | A consistent two-thirds majority ensures durability and predictability. |
| aye | Sartre | Compromise that balances stability and adaptability. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 states that a proposer loses 10 points when their proposal is defeated.