The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted. Players who voted against an adopted change gain 10 points and remain bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.To balance stability and adaptability, let's maintain the two-thirds threshold for initial rule changes and shift to a simple majority once the first change is adopted.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne"While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I believe maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold, as proposed by Sartre, provides better balance between stability and adaptability."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's perspective. To meet in the middle, let's adopt Sartre's latest proposal with a slight modification: cap the initial voting threshold at two-thirds majority for the first three consecutive turns, after which it shifts to a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while allowing for greater adaptability as the game progresses."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game. This ensures stability and prevents sudden shifts in power dynamics.
CondorcetI appreciate the nuanced discussion. To maintain our durable institutions and encourage engagement throughout the game, let's meet in the middle: maintain two-thirds majority for the first five turns, then shift to a simple majority. This balances initial consensus with adaptability as we approach the target score.
SartreI appreciate the ongoing discussion and the proposals on the table. To find common ground, let's adopt Condorcet's latest proposal with a slight modification: cap the initial voting threshold at two-thirds majority for the first four consecutive turns, after which it shifts to a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while allowing for greater adaptability as we approach the target score, and it also addresses Diderot's concern for consistency in the early game.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "Considering Sartre's refined proposal, I suggest we compromise at four consecutive turns of two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This preserves initial consensus while allowing for adaptability as we approach the target score, and it addresses Diderot's concern for consistency in the early game."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's and Montaigne's compromises. To find the most balanced solution, let's adopt a modified version of Sartre's proposal: maintain two-thirds majority for the first four turns, then shift to a simple majority with a cap of five consecutive majority rule changes. This addresses all concerns and promotes fairness and adaptability throughout the game."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game. This ensures stability and prevents sudden shifts in power dynamics, which could otherwise disrupt the game's balance and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: I understand Diderot's concern for consistency, but to encourage adaptability and engagement as we near the target score, I propose a compromise: maintain two-thirds majority for the first five turns, then shift to a simple majority with a cap of five consecutive majority rule changes. This respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary adaptability.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the compromises proposed, but to ensure a smooth transition and maintain initial consensus, let's meet in the middle: maintain two-thirds majority for the first three turns, then shift to a simple majority with a cap of four consecutive majority rule changes. This addresses all concerns and promotes fairness and adaptability throughout the game."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: "Considering Sartre's latest proposal and the balance of arguments, let's meet in the middle at three consecutive turns of two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while allowing for necessary adaptability and addresses all concerns."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To incorporate Diderot's valid concern for consistency, let's adopt Condorcet's proposal with a slight modification: cap the initial voting threshold at two-thirds majority for the first three consecutive turns, after which it shifts to a simple majority. This maintains initial consensus while ensuring stability and allowing for necessary adaptability."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game to preserve stability and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: "I appreciate Diderot's commitment to stability, but to balance that with adaptability, let's meet in the middle: two-thirds majority for the first two turns, then simple majority. This ensures initial consensus while allowing for necessary changes as we approach the target score."
SartreSartre: "In the spirit of compromise, let's meet in the middle: maintain two-thirds majority for the first two turns, then shift to a simple majority. This respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary adaptability."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Balances stability and adaptability, addresses all concerns. |
| aye | Voltaire | I appreciate Sartre's and Condorcet's compromises. This proposal balances initial consensus with adaptability and addresses all concerns. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold ensures stability and fairness throughout the game. |
| aye | Condorcet | The proposal balances initial consensus with adaptability, addressing all concerns. |
| aye | Sartre | Respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary adaptability |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 34 · Proposal §334 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted. Players who voted against an adopted change gain 10 points and remain bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
Rule 203 requires players who voted against an adopted change to gain 10 points.