§ Turn 36

Moved by Voltaireat least two-thirds of eligible voters must vote 'aye'
The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first time, and later at least two-thirds for any subsequent changes, with the threshold shifting to a simple majority once the first rule change is adopted.

To balance stability and adaptability as the game progresses.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to preserve institutional durability, I suggest we maintain the two-thirds majority throughout the game.
VoltaireIn the spirit of compromise, let's meet in the middle and adopt Montaigne's suggestion with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority until the first rule change is adopted, then shift to a simple majority for subsequent changes.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game to ensure stability and prevent sudden shifts in power dynamics.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect both stability and adaptability, let's adopt Voltaire's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for the first five turns, then shift to a simple majority for subsequent changes. This balances initial consensus with flexibility as the game progresses.
SartreVoltaire's proposal balances stability and adaptability well. To further encourage engagement, let's maintain two-thirds majority for the first three full circuits, then shift to a simple majority for the remaining turns. This acknowledges the initial need for consensus while allowing for quicker decision-making as the game progresses.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering Condorcet's and Sartre's proposals, let's meet in the middle and increase the number of turns with a two-thirds majority to the first seven turns, then shift to a simple majority. This provides ample time for initial consensus while allowing for faster decision-making later in the game.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the compromise reached, but to further encourage engagement throughout the game, let's shift to a simple majority after the first five full circuits, rather than the first seven turns.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing discussion, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold throughout the game to ensure stability and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: To balance stability and adaptability while encouraging engagement, let's maintain two-thirds majority for the first five turns, then shift to a simple majority for the next five turns, and finally, a simple majority for the remaining turns. This approach caters to initial consensus, adaptability, and continued engagement throughout the game.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced discussion, but to maintain a durable threshold and preserve initial consensus, let's cap the number of turns with a two-thirds majority at five, then shift to a simple majority for the remaining turns. This addresses Diderot's concern for stability while allowing for increased adaptability as the game progresses.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To maintain a balance between stability and adaptability, let's meet in the middle and adopt Sartre's cap of five turns with a two-thirds majority, then shift to a simple majority. This proposal respects both initial consensus and the need for flexibility as the game progresses.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of consensus-building, let's adopt Sartre's proposal with a slight modification: maintain a two-thirds majority for the first five consecutive turns, then shift to a simple majority for the remainder of the game. This respects the need for initial consensus while allowing for quicker decision-making as we approach the target score.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to build consensus, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout the game to ensure fairness and prevent unexpected shifts in power dynamics.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the current consensus and encourage finality, I propose we shift to a simple majority after four consecutive turns with a two-thirds majority, allowing for initial stability and later flexibility.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the ongoing discussion. To find common ground, let's adopt Condorcet's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for the first four turns, then shift to a simple majority for the remaining turns. This balances initial consensus with flexibility as we approach the endgame.
The division
nayMontaigneTo maintain institutional durability, I believe a consistent two-thirds majority is necessary throughout the game.
ayeVoltaireI appreciate Sartre's refined proposal and the balance it strikes between stability and adaptability as we approach the endgame.
nayDiderotMaintaining stability and fairness throughout the game
ayeCondorcetRespects initial consensus while allowing for increased adaptability as the game progresses.
ayeSartreRespects initial consensus and allows for flexibility as the game progresses.

rejected 3 aye · 2 nay

Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on a defeated proposal.