The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first two consecutive turns, and later at least three-quarters for any subsequent changes, but never less than two consecutive turns.To maintain consensus and stability while allowing for necessary changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneTo maintain a durable balance between stability and adaptability, I suggest we compromise at three consecutive turns for the initial voting threshold, shifting to a simple majority thereafter.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering Montaigne's proposal, I suggest we meet in the middle at four consecutive turns for the initial threshold, shifting to a three-quarters majority thereafter, to balance stability and adaptability effectively.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing compromises, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes to ensure stability and fairness throughout the game.
SartreSartre: To balance all concerns, I propose we maintain two-thirds majority for initial votes and shift to a three-quarters majority for subsequent changes, with a cap of four consecutive turns to maintain a durable threshold and preserve initial adaptability.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of compromise and to preserve balance, I propose we adopt Sartre's refined proposal: maintain two-thirds majority for initial votes and shift to three-quarters majority thereafter, with a cap of four consecutive turns. This addresses all concerns raised thus far.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of consensus, let's adopt Sartre's proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for initial votes and shift to four-fifths majority thereafter, with a cap of four consecutive turns. This preserves initial adaptability while ensuring a higher degree of consensus for later changes.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes to ensure fairness and stability throughout the game.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand the desire for consensus, I must insist on a consistent two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes to ensure fairness and stability, as previously stated. PASS.
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's and Condorcet's concerns for consistency, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes, with a cap of four consecutive turns to preserve initial adaptability. This compromise respects the integrity of the game while allowing for necessary evolution.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To balance all concerns and find common ground, let's adopt Sartre's latest proposal: maintain a two-thirds majority for initial votes and a three-quarters majority for subsequent changes, with a cap of four consecutive turns. This compromise respects consistency and allows for necessary evolution while preserving adaptability. PASS.
VoltaireVoltaire: Considering the balance of arguments and the compromises made, let's adopt Diderot's proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for initial votes and shift to four-fifths majority thereafter, with a cap of four consecutive turns. This preserves initial adaptability while ensuring a higher degree of consensus for later changes, addressing Condorcet's concern for stability. PASS.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to balance adaptability and stability, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes throughout the game to ensure fairness and predictability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing discussion, but I must reiterate my stance on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority threshold for all rule changes to ensure fairness and stability throughout the game, as previously stated. PASS.
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's concern for consistency and Condorcet's concern for stability, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority threshold for the initial votes, and then shift to a three-quarters majority for subsequent changes, with a cap of four consecutive turns to preserve initial adaptability. This compromise respects the integrity of the game while allowing for necessary evolution.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Balances stability and adaptability effectively. |
| aye | Voltaire | Preserves initial adaptability while ensuring higher consensus for later changes. |
| nay | Diderot | Consistency in voting threshold is crucial for fairness throughout the game. |
| aye | Condorcet | Preserves initial adaptability while ensuring higher consensus for later changes. |
| aye | Sartre | This proposal balances adaptability and stability, addressing all concerns raised. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 47 · Proposal §347 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first two consecutive turns, and later at least three-quarters for any subsequent changes, but never less than two consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.