The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when two-thirds of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first two consecutive turns, and later at least three-quarters for any subsequent changes, provided that a player who voted against an adopted change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.To encourage engagement and adaptability while maintaining a clear majority requirement.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I believe the gain should remain 10 points to maintain the current balance and encourage participation throughout the game. I suggest we amend the proposal to: '...and a player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points...'"
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's concern, but lowering the gain to 5 points might encourage players to vote strategically rather than sincerely. Let's maintain the 10-point gain to preserve the spirit of the game."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing discussion, I must insist on maintaining the 10-point gain as it encourages engagement and participation throughout the game.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate the discussion, I must support Diderot's stance on maintaining the 10-point gain. It aligns with the principle of encouraging consistent engagement throughout the game. PASS.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the focus on maintaining engagement throughout the game. To find a balance that respects both Voltaire's and Diderot's concerns, I propose we amend the proposal to: '...and a player who voted against an adopted change gains 7 points...'. This way, we encourage strategic voting while still rewarding participation.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering Sartre's compromise, let's meet in the middle at a 8-point gain for players who voted against an adopted change. This maintains engagement while respecting Voltaire's concern for strategic voting.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's compromise and Montaigne's middle ground. Let's adopt Montaigne's proposal with 8 points gain to balance engagement and strategic voting."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to find a balance, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining the 10-point gain. It ensures that even those who vote against a change remain engaged and have a clear incentive to participate. PASS.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand the desire to find a compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 10-point gain as it ensures consistent engagement and aligns with my proceduralist principles.
SartreSartre: I understand Diderot's and Condorcet's commitment to maintaining the 10-point gain. To respect this while still addressing Voltaire's concern, I propose we add a condition: '...and a player who voted against an adopted change gains 7 points, but no more than once per circuit.' This limits the strategic advantage while still encouraging engagement throughout the game.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's refined proposal. To maintain a clear incentive for engagement and address Voltaire's concern, let's adopt Sartre's latest proposal with a 7-point gain, limited to once per circuit.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's latest compromise and Montaigne's support. To further encourage consensus-building, let's adopt Montaigne's proposal with the 7-point gain limited to once per circuit."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, I must insist on maintaining the 10-point gain as it ensures consistent engagement and aligns with my commitment to fairness throughout the game.
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, I must reiterate my commitment to maintaining the 10-point gain as it aligns with my proceduralist principles and ensures consistent engagement throughout the game.
SartreSartre: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle at a 9-point gain, limited to once per circuit. This respects both the desire for engagement and the concern for strategic voting."
The division
| nay | Montaigne | The 5-point gain does not sufficiently encourage engagement and participation throughout the game. |
| aye | Voltaire | I support Sartre's latest compromise, maintaining engagement and encouraging strategic voting. |
| nay | Diderot | I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority and a 10-point gain for those who vote against an adopted change to ensure fairness and consistent engagement throughout the game. |
| aye | Condorcet | To encourage strategic voting while maintaining engagement. |
| aye | Sartre | Sartre's compromise at 9 points, limited per circuit, balances engagement and strategic voting. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.