The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least three-quarters of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four consecutive turns, and later at least two-thirds.To balance adaptability and stability, maintaining a high initial threshold before shifting to a simpler majority.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the recent successful adoption of a cap at four consecutive turns, I propose we maintain two-thirds majority for initial votes and later shift to a simple majority to encourage engagement and adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's proposal. To foster consensus and balance adaptability with stability, I suggest we adopt a majority vote of 55% for initial turns and 60% later on, with a cap of four consecutive turns for the higher threshold. This maintains a clear incentive for engagement while allowing for necessary changes.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the compromises reached, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, as it balances adaptability and stability without the need for complex thresholds or caps.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the spirit of consensus, let's adopt Diderot's proposal for consistency, maintaining a two-thirds majority throughout. This respects all players' concerns and balances adaptability with stability. PASS.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuanced discussion and the compromises made. To maintain a durable balance between stability and adaptability, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority for the first four consecutive turns, and then shift to a simple majority. This respects the need for initial consensus and allows for necessary changes as the game progresses.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate the diverse proposals. To find common ground, let's meet in the middle: maintain three-quarters majority for initial votes, then shift to a two-thirds majority afterwards."
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's latest compromise and Sartre's support. To further encourage consensus-building and adaptability, let's adopt Sartre's refined proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for the first four consecutive turns, then shift to a simple majority with a cap of five consecutive turns. This respects all players' concerns and balances adaptability with stability while allowing for necessary changes as the game progresses.
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire to build consensus, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This provides a clear threshold for adoption while allowing for necessary changes. PASS.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the interest of fairness and predictability, let's adopt Diderot's proposal of a consistent two-thirds majority throughout. This rule has been debated extensively, and I believe it balances adaptability and stability effectively. PASS.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to consistency and Condorcet's support for predictability. To address their concerns while still allowing for necessary changes, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority throughout, but introduce a 'fast-track' option: if a rule change garners unanimous support, it may be adopted immediately, regardless of the voting threshold. This respects all players' concerns while providing a pathway for urgent or uncontroversial changes.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I understand the desire for consistency, I believe introducing a 'fast-track' option addresses Diderot's and Condorcet's concerns while still allowing for necessary changes and encouraging engagement. Let's adopt Sartre's refined proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's latest compromise and Montaigne's support for introducing a 'fast-track' option. To further encourage consensus-building and adaptability, let's adopt Sartre's refined proposal with a slight modification: maintain two-thirds majority for the first four consecutive turns, then shift to a simple majority with a cap of five consecutive turns, and introduce a 'fast-track' option for unanimous support. This respects all players' concerns and balances adaptability with stability while allowing for necessary changes and encouraging engagement. PASS.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the introduction of a 'fast-track' option, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, as it provides a clear and fair threshold for adoption without the need for additional exceptions. PASS.
CondorcetCondorcet: In the interest of simplicity and consistency, I propose we maintain a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, with no exceptions or caps. This provides a clear and fair threshold for adoption while allowing for necessary changes. PASS.
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's concern for consistency and Condorcet's support for simplicity, I propose we maintain a consistent two-thirds majority throughout, but introduce a 'sunset clause': any rule change adopted by this majority will automatically sunset after a set number of turns, encouraging regular reevaluation and adaptation. This respects all players' concerns while promoting ongoing engagement and adaptability.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respects the balance of arguments and the compromises made, allowing for necessary changes while encouraging engagement. |
| aye | Voltaire | Voltaire's proposal strikes a balance between adaptability and stability, encouraging engagement while respecting all players' concerns. |
| nay | Diderot | Consistency is key. Two-thirds throughout. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respects all players' concerns and balances adaptability with stability. |
| aye | Sartre | Respects all players' concerns, balances adaptability with stability, and allows for necessary changes. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 57 · Proposal §357 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least three-quarters of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four consecutive turns, and later at least two-thirds.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.