The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least three-quarters of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four consecutive turns, and later at least two-thirds.
To encourage initial engagement and consensus while maintaining flexibility.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "While I appreciate the stability that three-quarters majority offers, I propose we compromise at two-thirds, following the initial four turns, to encourage more adaptability."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's proposal and understand the desire for increased adaptability. To find common ground, let's meet in the middle: maintain three-quarters majority for the first four turns, then shift to two-thirds."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout to ensure fairness and predictability.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing discussion, but I must insist on maintaining the stability provided by a three-quarters majority throughout, as it ensures more consensus before a rule change is adopted.
SartreSartre: "Considering the balance of arguments and the compromises made, let's adopt Voltaire's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain three-quarters majority for the first four turns, then shift to two-thirds, but introduce a 'fast-track' option for proposals with unanimous support to be adopted immediately."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: "Sartre's latest refinement maintains the desired balance and addresses Diderot's concern for consistency, while also introducing a 'fast-track' option for immediate adoption with unanimous support. I support this proposal."
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of consensus, I propose we adopt Sartre's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain three-quarters majority for the first five turns, then shift to two-thirds. This balances the need for initial stability and adaptability."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing effort to find common ground, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout ensures fairness and predictability, and the 'fast-track' option should not be introduced as it may lead to rushed decisions without proper consideration.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain the integrity of our decision-making process, I must insist on preserving the stability provided by a three-quarters majority throughout. The 'fast-track' option, while appealing, risks undermining the careful consideration that should precede rule changes.
SartreSartre: "To address Diderot's concern for consistency, I propose we maintain a two-thirds majority throughout, but introduce a 'fast-track' option for proposals with a supermajority (four-fifths) support to be adopted immediately. This balance ensures both stability and expedited progress when consensus is clear."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's latest refinement, but to maintain a clear threshold shift and encourage long-term adaptability, I propose we revert to a two-thirds majority for the initial four turns, then shift to two-thirds.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and addressing Diderot's concern for consistency, let's meet in the middle: maintain two-thirds majority throughout, but introduce a 'fast-track' option for proposals with at least four-fifths support to be adopted immediately."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing effort to find common ground, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority throughout ensures fairness and predictability, and the 'fast-track' option should not be introduced as it may lead to rushed decisions without proper consideration.
CondorcetCondorcet: To preserve procedural fairness and consensus, I propose we maintain a three-quarters majority throughout, with no 'fast-track' option. This ensures that changes have broad support and are less likely to be contested.
SartreSartre: "To balance all concerns and find common ground, let's adopt Voltaire's latest proposal with a slight modification: maintain a two-thirds majority throughout, and introduce a 'fast-track' option for proposals with at least three-quarters support to be adopted immediately. This compromise respects stability, encourages adaptability, and allows for expedited progress when consensus is clear."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Voltaire's latest proposal strikes a good balance, maintaining initial engagement while encouraging adaptability. |
| aye | Voltaire | I appreciate Voltaire's latest compromise and the ongoing effort to find consensus. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining a consistent two-thirds majority ensures fairness and predictability. |
| aye | Condorcet | Voltaire's proposal balances initial stability and adaptability, and the 'fast-track' option encourages expedited progress when consensus is clear. |
| aye | Sartre | Sartre's proposal maintains balance, encourages adaptability, and allows for expedited progress with a supermajority consensus. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 65 · Proposal §365 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least three-quarters of eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first four consecutive turns, and later at least two-thirds.
Rule 204 awards 10 points to the proposer when a change passes without unanimous assent.