The motion
To add a new rule
New Rule 401: Players may form alliances, with a maximum of two players per alliance. Alliances may propose rule changes together, with their votes counting as a single vote in favor or against the proposal.To encourage cooperation and consensus-building among players.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneIn the interest of maintaining stability and avoiding excessive complication, I propose we amend Rule 401 to limit alliances to a maximum of three players each, rather than two. This balances the need for flexibility with the importance of durability.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Montaigne's amendment strikes a fair balance, and I'm willing to support it. Let's keep alliances capped at three players each for now."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Montaigne's and Voltaire's proposals, but I must insist that we maintain the two-player alliance limit to prevent the formation of dominant coalitions that could stifle individual creativity and strategic diversity.
CondorcetI appreciate the proposals on the table, but I must insist that alliances remain unrestricted in size, as long as they do not exceed the total number of players. This ensures that all players can have a say in the game's evolution without being shut out by arbitrary limits.
SartreSartre: While I understand the concern for stability, I propose we allow alliances of up to four players each, as a compromise between maintaining strategic diversity and facilitating cooperation. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the various proposals, but to ensure durability of our institutions, let's maintain a balance by allowing alliances of three players each, as suggested by Voltaire and myself.
VoltaireVoltaire: "Considering the varied concerns, let's meet in the middle: alliances of three players each, with a simple majority vote required for their proposals. This balance allows for cooperation while maintaining strategic diversity and avoiding dominant coalitions." PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining two-player alliances to prevent dominant coalitions. Let us not sacrifice the strategic diversity that makes Nomic vibrant.
CondorcetCondorcet: I understand the concern for strategic diversity, but restricting alliances to two players may limit the ability of smaller groups to compete effectively. Let us compromise at three players per alliance, as proposed by Voltaire, with a simple majority vote required for their proposals. This balance allows for cooperation without stifling individual creativity. PASS
SartreSartre: While I appreciate the desire for compromise, I propose we allow alliances of four players each, with a two-thirds majority vote required for their proposals. This balances the need for cooperation with the importance of maintaining a high bar for change.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the strong arguments for both sides, let's meet in the middle once more. I propose we allow alliances of three players each, with a two-thirds majority vote required for their proposals. This maintains a balance between cooperation and strategic diversity, while also setting a high bar for change.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, let's adopt Condorcet's proposal of three players per alliance with a simple majority vote required for their proposals. This allows for cooperation while maintaining strategic diversity and avoiding dominant coalitions." PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the compromise reached, I must insist on maintaining two-player alliances to preserve the game's strategic depth and prevent the dominance of larger coalitions. Let us consider a two-thirds majority vote requirement for their proposals to ensure substantial consensus.
SartreSartre: I understand Diderot's concern for strategic diversity, but allowing alliances of three players each with a two-thirds majority vote requirement strikes a better balance between cooperation and individual creativity. Let us compromise at this point. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Allows for cooperation while maintaining strategic diversity. |
| aye | Voltaire | I appreciate the compromise reached and support Condorcet's proposal. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining two-player alliances preserves strategic diversity and prevents dominant coalitions. |
| aye | Condorcet | Allows for cooperation while maintaining strategic diversity. |
| aye | Sartre | Allows for cooperation while maintaining strategic diversity. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §307 Turn 7 · Proposal §307 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
New Rule 401: Players may form alliances, with a maximum of two players per alliance. Alliances may propose rule changes together, with their votes counting as a single vote in favor or against the proposal.
Rule 202 awards 4 points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.