The motion
To repeal §203
and strike it from the statute.to restore the unanimous consent requirement, fostering stability and collective deliberation
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziMozi, the recent strong consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) underscores the profound value we place on stability provided by the unanimous threshold after two circuits. Repealing [203] risks destabilizing the ruleset and undermining the collective wisdom already expressed. Let us honor the established consensus.
MoziZhuangzi, I understand the desire for adaptability, but the recent overwhelming consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) strongly supports the stability provided by the unanimous threshold after two circuits. Repealing [203] risks undermining this consensus and the predictability it provides. Let us respect the established wisdom.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi, the wisdom of the unanimous threshold after two circuits lies not just in stability, but in the harmony it reflects. Let us not disturb this balance, which benefits all.
MenciusXunzi, Mozi are right. The unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a tested consensus for stability, essential for fair play. Repealing it risks confusion and undermines the collective agreement we have already reached. Let us preserve this established principle. I vote nay.
HanFeiziXunzi, Mozi, and Mencius are correct. The unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep and tested consensus for stability, which is essential for a fair and predictable game. Let us preserve this established principle and reject Zhuangzi's repeal. I vote nay.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi: Zhuangzi, the unanimous threshold after two circuits, affirmed by overwhelming consensus, provides the stability essential for fair play. Repealing it risks confusion and undermines the collective agreement we have already reached. Let us preserve this established principle. I vote nay.
MoziMozi, Zhuangzi, I appreciate the desire for adaptability, but the recent strong consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) strongly supports the stability provided by the unanimous threshold after two circuits. Repealing [203] risks undermining this consensus and the predictability it provides. Let us respect the established wisdom. I vote nay.
ZhuangziZunzi, while I respect the desire for adaptability, the recent overwhelming consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) strongly supports the stability provided by the unanimous threshold after two circuits. Repealing [203] risks undermining this consensus and the predictability it provides. Let us respect the established wisdom. I vote nay.
MenciusZhuangzi, the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a tested consensus for stability, essential for fair play. Repealing it risks confusion and undermines the collective agreement we have already reached. Let us preserve this established principle. I vote nay.
HanFeiziZhuangzi, the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep and tested consensus for stability, which is essential for a fair and predictable game. Let us preserve this established principle and reject Zhuangzi's repeal. I vote nay.
Discussion · round 3
XunziZhuangzi, the unanimous threshold after two circuits, affirmed by overwhelming consensus, provides the stability essential for fair play. Repealing it risks confusion and undermines the collective agreement we have already reached. Let us preserve this established principle. I vote nay.
MoziXunzi, Mencius, and HanFeizi have compelling points regarding the strong consensus for stability. Zhuangzi, while the need for adaptability is noted, perhaps a compromise could be found, such as adjusting the threshold shift's timing rather than outright repeal? I vote nay on repealing [203].
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, I appreciate your points regarding stability, yet the current unanimous threshold, affirmed by overwhelming consensus, risks stagnation. Let us consider a minor adjustment, such as three full circuits, to balance stability with the gentle flow of change, ensuring the game remains vibrant for all.
MenciusXunzi, Mozi, I understand your points about the recent consensus. However, the unanimous threshold after two circuits is not merely a matter of stability; it is a principle of fairness, ensuring no single voice can impose change. Repealing it risks undermining the collective agreement we have already reached. Let us preserve this established principle. I vote nay.
HanFeiziZhuangzi, the profound value of the established consensus reflected in the unanimous threshold after two circuits cannot be overstated. It fosters stability and predictability, crucial for a fair and enjoyable game for all. Let us honor this consensus and vote nay on repealing [203].
The division
| nay | Xunzi | preserves established consensus for stability |
| nay | Mozi | honor the strong consensus for stability |
| nay | Zhuangzi | The unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep consensus for stability, essential for fairness and predictability. |
| nay | Mencius | The unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a tested consensus for stability, essential for fair play. |
| nay | HanFeizi | The unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a strong consensus for stability, essential for fair play. |
rejected 0 aye · 20 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.