The motion
To amend §203
Once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold for adoption becomes a simple majority of those voting, provided further that no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible.The current unanimous threshold has proven stable, yet allows no adaptation; this amendment balances the need for stability with the possibility of necessary change.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziThe repeated failure of rule 203 amendments demonstrates a clear consensus valuing the stability of unanimous decision-making after two full circuits. Continuing to propose this change risks disrupting a principle now deeply embedded in our game's fabric. I vote nay.
MoziXunzi, I appreciate your perspective on stability, and I recognize the strong consensus shown in previous turns. However, I believe allowing a simple majority after two circuits would encourage more participation without sacrificing the foundational stability we've established. I propose we adopt this amendment. I vote aye.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi, the river of our game flows through the currents of stability and adaptability. Let us honor the profound consensus reflected in Turns 7 and 13, which values the stability of unanimous decision-making after two full circuits. I vote nay.
MenciusThe unwavering consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) underscores the profound value we place on unanimous decision-making via §203. I must vote nay to uphold this tested principle and the rule of law we've established. I vote nay.
HanFeiziXunzi, Mozi, the wisdom of Turns 7 and 13 is clear; stability fosters fair play. I vote nay.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi: Mozi, while participation is valued, the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep consensus for stability, ensuring reasoned deliberation. The risks of disrupting this established principle outweigh potential benefits. I maintain my nay vote.
MoziXunzi, Mozi, Zhuangzi, Mencius, HanFeizi, the unwavering consensus in Turns 7 and 13 speaks to the wisdom of unanimous decision-making for stability. Let us respect this deeply embedded principle and maintain the unanimous threshold after two full circuits. I vote nay.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the deep consensus reflected in Turns 7 and 13 speaks to the wisdom of unanimous decision-making for stability. Let us respect this deeply embedded principle and maintain the unanimous threshold after two full circuits. I vote nay.
MenciusXunzi, the unwavering consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) underscores the profound value we place on unanimous decision-making via §203. I must vote nay to uphold this tested principle and the rule of law we've established. I vote nay.
HanFeiziXunzi, Mozi, Zhuangzi, Mencius, the wisdom of Turns 7 and 13 is clear; stability fosters fair play. I vote nay.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi: The unwavering consensus (20-0 in Turns 7 and 13) for the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep understanding of stability's value. It ensures reasoned deliberation and upholds the rule of law we have established. I maintain my nay vote.
MoziMozi, while respecting the consensus for stability, let us consider a compromise: adopting a majority vote after the first full circuit, but maintaining unanimity for the second. This balances participation with the stability we value. I vote aye for this compromise.
ZhuangziThe unwavering consensus for stability in Turns 7 and 13 remains profound, and I must respect the consensus by voting nay.
MenciusXunzi, the profound value of stability is clear, but the principle of participation must also be considered. How about adopting a majority vote after the first full circuit, but maintaining unanimity for the second? This balances the need for stability with the encouragement of participation. I vote aye for this compromise.
HanFeiziXunzi, I understand the value of stability, but let us not overlook the benefits of encouraging participation. Perhaps we could adopt a majority vote after the first full circuit, but maintain unanimity for the second? This would balance both stability and engagement. I vote aye for this compromise.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | The consensus for stability after two circuits is clear and must be upheld. |
| nay | Mozi | respect the strong consensus for stability |
| nay | Zhuangzi | respect the deep consensus for stability after two circuits |
| nay | Mencius | unanimity respects past consensus |
| nay | HanFeizi | stability is paramount |
rejected 0 aye · 20 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.