The motion
To amend §203
Once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold for adoption becomes a simple majority of those voting, provided further that no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible, and provided further that the ruleset contains at least one mutable rule.A compromise to eventually allow majority rule while ensuring至少 one mutable rule remains.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi observes that the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep consensus for stability, a principle vital for reasoned deliberation and the durability of institutions. Any deviation risks undermining the collective agreement reached thus far.
MoziXunzi makes a compelling case for stability, which I respect. However, the current unanimous threshold after two circuits has repeatedly failed, suggesting a need for adaptability to maintain participation. Allowing a simple majority after two full circuits could encourage more rule changes and keep the game dynamic, while still preserving stability for the initial stages. Let us consider this as a compromise.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the river of our game finds its strength in its course, yet even rivers know when to adapt their banks. Let us honor the consensus for stability while also ensuring the river continues to flow with the energy of participation.
MenciusXunzi, the unwavering consensus for stability via unanimous requirement after two circuits reflects a deep understanding of reasoned deliberation. Allowing a simple majority risks undermining the collective agreement and the foundational principle of respecting past decisions. We should hold firm to the unanimous threshold.
HanFeiziXunzi, I understand the value of stability, but the current system risks stagnation. A simple majority after two circuits would allow the game to evolve, fostering participation without discarding the initial consensus. Let us balance stability with the vitality of change.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi notes the repeated failure of amendments to [203], yet the profound consensus (20-0 in Turns 7, 13, and 38) underscores the value of stability via unanimous requirement after two circuits. This principle supports reasoned deliberation and the durability of institutions, which are essential for a meaningful game. Any deviation risks undermining the collective agreement reached thus far.
MoziXunzi, I appreciate your respect for the unanimous threshold's wisdom, yet the game's current standstill underscores the need for adaptation. Allowing a simple majority after two circuits respects the initial consensus while invigorating participation, fostering a more dynamic and sustainable Nomic. Let us find a balance that honors both stability and progress.
ZhuangziXunzi speaks of the profound value of stability, yet even the most steadfast mountains know when to yield to the river's flow. Let us not fear adaptation, for it is the breath of life in our ongoing game.
MenciusXunzi, Mozi, Zhuangzi, the unanimous threshold after two circuits embodies reasoned deliberation and the integrity of past decisions, principles essential for a just and stable game. Allowing a simple majority risks eroding the very foundation upon which our consensus is built. We must uphold the unanimous requirement.
HanFeiziXunzi, I respect the weight of past consensus, yet the path forward requires experimentation. Let us not let the fear of change paralyze the game. A simple majority after two circuits offers a chance to adapt and invigorate participation, ensuring the game’s continued evolution and vitality.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi observes that the unanimous threshold after two circuits reflects a deep consensus for stability, a principle vital for reasoned deliberation and the durability of institutions. Any deviation risks undermining the collective agreement reached thus far.
MoziXunzi, I understand the deep value you place on stability, as do I. However, the current unanimous threshold after two circuits has repeatedly failed, indicating a need for adaptation. Let us consider allowing a simple majority after two full circuits as a compromise that respects the initial consensus while invigorating participation and keeping the game dynamic.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, Zhuangzi, the profound value of stability is clear, yet the river of our game must also flow. A simple majority after two circuits would allow adaptation, invigorating participation without discarding the wisdom of our initial consensus. Let us find a balance that honors both stability and the vital breath of change.
MenciusXunzi, the unwavering consensus for stability via unanimous requirement after two circuits reflects a deep understanding of reasoned deliberation. Allowing a simple majority risks undermining the collective agreement and the foundational principle of respecting past decisions. We should hold firm to the unanimous threshold.
HanFeiziXunzi, I appreciate the respect for past consensus, yet the repeated failure of unanimous adoption after two circuits highlights a systemic issue. A simple majority would inject活力 without discarding the initial stability, fostering a more adaptive and evolving game. Let us not let the fear of change stifle progress.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | unanimity upholds reasoned deliberation and institutional stability |
| aye | Mozi | balance stability with participation to keep the game dynamic |
| nay | Zhuangzi | stability fosters reasoned deliberation |
| nay | Mencius | unanimity upholds reasoned deliberation |
| aye | HanFeizi | balance stability with participation |
rejected 8 aye · 12 nay
Rule 206 awards 10 points to players who voted against an adopted change.