The motion
To amend §203
Once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold for adoption becomes a simple majority of those voting, unless a rule explicitly provides otherwise.To clarify the existing rule and ensure fairness in the voting process.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi notes that the recent failed attempts to amend rule 203 suggest a delicate balance is present. We should proceed cautiously to avoid disrupting the established order.
MoziMozi notes that the recent failures indicate a strong consensus on the current threshold. Perhaps we should refine the proposal slightly, for example by adding a provision for a special committee to review threshold changes after a full circuit? This respects stability while allowing for future consideration.
ZhuangziHanFeizi, the recent failures highlight the consensus's strength. A special committee risks adding unnecessary complexity. Let us trust the current clear majority threshold.
MenciusMozi, a special committee introduces unnecessary complexity and undermines the principle of clear, direct rule changes. Let's maintain the simple majority threshold as established. PASS
HanFeiziThe recent failures suggest stability is valued; however, a simple majority respects the principle of majority rule, allowing the game to evolve as it progresses. I propose we trust the current mechanism. PASS
Discussion · round 2
XunziHanFeizi, the established unanimity reflects a commitment to durable consensus. I propose we maintain the current requirement to preserve stability. PASS
MoziMozi supports Zhuangzi's caution, as recent history shows the current threshold is well-accepted. We should trust the current mechanism and maintain the unanimous consent requirement. PASS
ZhuangziThe recent failures underscore the wisdom of the current unanimous threshold, ensuring stability rather than risking disruption through premature majority rule. PASS
MenciusXunzi, the current unanimous requirement for adoption reflects a respect for mutual consent and long-term stability, essential principles for any just rule. Let us uphold this consensus to preserve the integrity of our collective agreement. PASS
HanFeiziHanFeizi: The recent failures suggest stability is valued; however, a simple majority respects the principle of majority rule, allowing the game to evolve as it progresses. I propose we trust the current mechanism. PASS
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi: The recent consensus underscores the value of stability. Let us uphold the unanimous consent requirement, preserving the integrity of collective agreement and mutual consent.
MoziMozi notes that maintaining unanimous consent for adoption preserves the stability that recent votes have shown we value, ensuring that changes reflect a broad consensus and mutual agreement among all players. PASS
ZhuangziHanFeizi, the recent failures underscore the wisdom of the current unanimous threshold, ensuring stability rather than risking disruption through premature majority rule. PASS
MenciusXunzi, the unanimous requirement embodies the principle that changes must reflect a broad consensus, ensuring stability and fairness for all. Let us maintain this essential safeguard. PASS
HanFeiziHanFeizi: The path forward lies in evolution, not rigidity. Let us adapt, trusting that the game will find its balance. PASS
The division
| nay | Xunzi | preserves stability valued in recent votes |
| nay | Mozi | maintain stability |
| abstain | Zhuangzi | (unintelligible ballot) |
| nay | Mencius | unanimity preserves mutual consent essential for just rule changes. |
| abstain | HanFeizi | (unintelligible ballot) |
rejected 0 aye · 12 nay · 8 abstain
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.