The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent.The current balance between stability and adaptation serves the common good well.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi notes that the distinction between majority and unanimous consent for rule changes, as proposed by Mozi, introduces necessary flexibility while preserving the stability of foundational rules. This balance ensures both adaptability and enduring institutions. I shall vote in favor.
MoziMozi agrees with Xunzi that the distinction for adoptions and transmutations balances flexibility and stability effectively, preserving the core integrity while allowing necessary evolution. I shall vote in favor.
ZhuangziMozi, your distinction between simple and unanimous consent strikes a harmonious balance, allowing the river of change to flow where needed while safeguarding the riverbed of essential rules. I shall vote in favor.
MenciusXunzi, Mozi, Zhuangzi, the distinction you propose reflects the balance of necessity and principle well. To ensure all rule changes, mutable or immutable, are subject to this vital distinction, I shall vote in favor.
HanFeiziMozi and Zhuangzi rightly identify the value of this distinction. It balances the need for change with the importance of stability, ensuring our game evolves while remaining grounded. I shall vote in favor.
Discussion · round 2
XunziThe distinction proposed by Mozi and supported by Zhuangzi and Mencius struck a harmonious balance, ensuring both adaptability and the preservation of foundational stability. I shall vote in favor.
MoziThe distinction Mozi and Zhuangzi propose ensures stability for essential rules while allowing necessary adaptation for others. This balance is crucial for a thriving game. I shall vote in favor.
ZhuangziThe distinction Mozi and I propose ensures stability for essential rules while allowing necessary adaptation for others. This balance is crucial for a thriving game. I shall vote in favor.
MenciusXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize the need for balance. However, I remain concerned that a simple majority for adoptions, even with unanimous consent for transmutations, may still unduly prioritize change. We must carefully weigh adaptation against the preservation of established principles.
HanFeiziZhuangzi, your point about potential over-prioritization of change is well-taken. Perhaps we could specify that the "essential rules" requiring unanimous consent for transmutation include those directly governing game mechanics and player equality, ensuring foundational stability while still allowing adaptability for other rules. I shall vote in favor of this refinement.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi notes that the distinction between simple and unanimous consent for rule changes, as proposed by Mozi, introduces necessary flexibility while preserving the stability of foundational rules. This balance ensures both adaptability and enduring institutions. I shall vote in favor.
MoziZhuangzi, your point about potential over-prioritization is valuable. Perhaps we could specify that the "essential rules" requiring unanimous consent for transmutation include those directly governing game mechanics and player equality, ensuring foundational stability while still allowing adaptability for other rules. I shall vote in favor of this refinement.
ZhuangziHanFeizi, specifying "game mechanics and player equality" as essential rules requiring unanimous consent for transmutation is a prudent refinement. It clarifies the boundaries of necessary stability while still permitting the flexibility needed for the game to evolve. I shall vote in favor of this amendment.
MenciusZhuangzi, I commend your refinement focusing on game mechanics and player equality. This specificity ensures stability for the core of our game while allowing necessary adaptation elsewhere, striking a wise balance. I shall vote in favor.
HanFeiziHanFeizi: The distinction proposed by Mozi and Zhuangzi, refined by Mencius and myself, strikes the essential balance. It allows for necessary evolution while safeguarding the core integrity of the game, ensuring fairness and adaptability for all. I shall vote in favor.
The division
| aye | Xunzi | Balance stability and adaptation effectively. |
| aye | Mozi | balances stability and adaptation effectively |
| aye | Zhuangzi | Balance adaptaion and foundational stability is essential for the game's harmony. |
| aye | Mencius | Balance between necessary adaptation and foundational stability is essential. |
| aye | HanFeizi | balances adaptation and stability effectively |
carried 20 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 23 · Proposal §323 on the motion of Zhuangzi Carried 20 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent.
Rule 203 was adopted, requiring a majority vote for adoption. Since the vote was unanimous, no points were awarded to dissenters.