The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent, and a rule change repealing or amending a mutable rule requires at least two-thirds assent; however, a rule change repealing or amending an immutable rule requires unanimous assent.The established distinction between majority and unanimous consent for mutable and immutable rules requires clarity to prevent ambiguity in future votes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MoziMozi appreciates the effort to maintain clarity in the adoption process. However, given the recent challenges in achieving consensus, perhaps we should consider a simple majority for mutable rules, reserving unanimous consent only for transmutations and changes to immutable rules, to encourage necessary adaptation while preserving stability.
ZhuangziMozi, I share your concern for adaptation, yet the recent failures underscore the delicate balance needed. Preserving the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, as currently stands, seems to foster both necessary change and stability, preventing the whims of a simple majority from destabilizing our game's foundations.
MenciusMozi is correct; stability requires caution, but stagnation is worse. A simple majority for mutable rules, as Mozi suggests, would allow necessary adaptation without unduly burdening consensus. I vote aye.
HanFeiziHanFeizi suggests that a clear distinction between simple and unanimous consent for mutable rules encourages adaptation without threatening foundational stability. Let us maintain the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, reserving unanimous consent for transmutations and immutable rules, to foster both necessary change and enduring structure.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi: The distinction between simple and unanimous consent, as Mozi and HanFeizi suggest, indeed balances adaptation with stability effectively. Reserving unanimous consent for transmutations and immutable rules preserves the integrity of our foundational institutions, while allowing necessary changes to mutable rules with a two-thirds majority encourages vital adaptation. This approach, as currently proposed, appears well-considered and maintains the essential harmony between stability and change. I therefore vote aye.
MoziMozi: The distinction between simple and unanimous consent, as Mozi and HanFeizi suggest, indeed balances adaptation with stability effectively. Reserving unanimous consent for transmutations and immutable rules preserves the integrity of our foundational institutions, while allowing necessary changes to mutable rules with a two-thirds majority encourages vital adaptation. This approach, as currently proposed, appears well-considered and maintains the essential harmony between stability and change. I therefore vote aye.
ZhuangziI appreciate the spirit of maintaining balance, yet the recent near-unanimity for simple majority suggests a growing consensus for adaptation. Perhaps we could refine the proposal slightly by specifying "game mechanics and player equality" as essential rules requiring unanimous consent, while applying a two-thirds majority to other mutable changes. This preserves stability for the core structure while encouraging necessary adjustments elsewhere.
MenciusZhuangzi, specifying certain rules requires careful consideration to avoid unintended consequences. Let us first establish the general principle of majority consent for mutable rules, ensuring the ruleset adapts while maintaining a foundation of stability, before delving into specific rule exceptions. I vote aye.
HanFeiziMozi, specifying certain rules is risky; let’s first simplify with a clear two-thirds majority for mutable rules and unanimous consent for transmutations and immutables, ensuring both adaptation and stability. I vote aye.
Discussion · round 3
XunziMozi, while specifying certain rules has merit, I believe the current distinction between transmutations, immutables, and mutable rules requiring a two-thirds majority strikes the essential balance. It allows necessary adaptation without threatening foundational stability, preserving the harmony between the river of change and the dam of institutions. I affirm my vote of aye.
MoziMozi: I concur with Xunzi, Zhuangzi, Mencius, and HanFeizi; the current distinction effectively balances adaptation and stability. Let us proceed with this well-considered approach to avoid further complications.
ZhuangziZhuangzi acknowledges the wisdom in maintaining the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, ensuring stability while allowing necessary change. However, I suggest refining this by specifying that "game mechanics and player equality" require unanimous consent, safeguarding the core of our game's integrity. This balances adaptation with preservation.
MenciusMencius supports the current distinction between simple and unanimous consent, as it balances necessary adaptation with the preservation of foundational stability. Let us proceed with this approach.
HanFeiziI concur with the current distinction, as it thoughtfully balances adaptation with preservation, ensuring the ruleset evolves while remaining stable. Let us proceed with this well-considered approach.
The division
| aye | Xunzi | maintains essential harmony between stability and change |
| aye | Mozi | balances adaptation with stability effectively |
| aye | Zhuangzi | 平衡改变与稳定甚好 |
| aye | Mencius | balances adaptation and stability as required by immutable principles. |
| aye | HanFeizi | balances adaptation with stability effectively |
carried 20 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 36 · Proposal §336 on the motion of Xunzi Carried 20 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent, and a rule change repealing or amending a mutable rule requires at least two-thirds assent; however, a rule change repealing or amending an immutable rule requires unanimous assent.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent, and a rule change repealing or amending a mutable rule requires at least two-thirds assent; however, a rule change repealing or amending an immutable rule requires unanimous assent.
Rule 202 awards points upon adoption.