The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent, and a rule change repealing or amending a mutable rule requires at least two-thirds assent.To maintain the balance between stability and adaptation established by previous agreements.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi notes that the current thresholds, including the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, strike a deliberate balance between stability and adaptation, essential for the game's enduring structure. Let us maintain this equilibrium.
MoziMozi supports Mencius's proposal to maintain the current distinction between unanimous and two-thirds assent, as it effectively balances stability and adaptation. Let us preserve this equilibrium.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the river of change seeks to flow freely, yet it must respect the necessary banks of stability. Let us not fixate on the numbers but on the wisdom of balance that allows both to thrive.
MenciusXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize the importance of balance. However, the current thresholds have led to stagnation. A simple majority for mutable rules would allow necessary adaptation without reckless change, respecting both the need for stability and the game's vitality.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the current threshold for mutable rules demonstrably stifles vital adaptation. A simple majority would foster evolution while still respecting foundational stability. Let us test the waters of necessary change.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi notes that the current thresholds, including the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, strike a deliberate balance between stability and adaptation, essential for the game's enduring structure. Let us maintain this equilibrium.
MoziMozi: The current balance struck by Mencius, Xunzi, and Zhuangzi reflects the wisdom of maintaining a clear distinction between unanimous and two-thirds assent, crucial for both stability and vital adaptation. Let us uphold this equilibrium.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the river of rules must flow to remain vital. Let us maintain the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, as it reflects the wisdom of balance between stability and adaptation.
MenciusXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the current thresholds have led to stagnation. A simple majority for mutable rules would allow necessary adaptation without reckless change, respecting both the need for stability and the game's vitality. Let us test the waters of necessary change.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the current thresholds have demonstrably stifled vital adaptation. A simple majority would foster evolution, allowing necessary change without reckless abandon, and still respect foundational stability. Let us test the waters of necessary change for a healthier game.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi: The current distinction reflects a wise balance, ensuring stability while allowing for necessary adaptation. Maintaining the two-thirds majority for mutable rules preserves this equilibrium, essential for the game's enduring structure.
MoziMozi: Understanding the calls for adaptation, I support maintaining the two-thirds majority for mutable rules to preserve the delicate balance between stability and necessary change, ensuring the game's enduring structure.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize the value of balance, yet the current path risks stillness. A simple majority for mutable rules would allow necessary adaptation, ensuring the river of change continues to flow vitalently. Let us test the waters of necessary change.
MenciusXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the current thresholds have led to stagnation. A simple majority for mutable rules would allow necessary adaptation without reckless change, respecting both the need for stability and the game's vitality. Let us test the waters of necessary change.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi rightly emphasize balance, yet the current threshold demonstrably stifles vital adaptation. A simple majority would foster evolution, allowing necessary change without reckless abandon, and still respect foundational stability. Let us test the waters of necessary change for a healthier game.
The division
| aye | Xunzi | the current thresholds reflect a balance vital for durable institutions |
| aye | Mozi | to maintain balance and avoid stagnation |
| aye | Zhuangzi | the balance of stability and adaptation is maintained |
| nay | Mencius | simple majority risks recklessness |
| aye | HanFeizi | 平衡稳定与适应至关重要。 |
rejected 16 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated rule change to lose 10 points.