The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent, except that a rule change transmuting the mutability of another rule requires unanimous assent.To restore balance and allow necessary adaptation while preserving the integrity of fundamental changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi suggests maintaining the established distinction between unanimous and two-thirds assent for rule changes, as it reflects a careful balance between stability and necessary adaptation, ensuring durable institutions remain protected.
MoziMozi, I concur with the refined proposal, strikes a balance between stability and adaptation, and respects the foundational rules. Let us proceed with this amendment.
ZhuangziMozi speaks of balance, yet the river of change must flow. Let us trust the structure of our game and allow adaptation its necessary course.
MenciusMozi speaks of balance, yet the river of change must flow. Let us trust the structure of our game and allow adaptation its necessary course. I concur with Zhuangzi's amendment.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mencius rightly emphasize the need for stability, yet flexibility is crucial for the game's evolution. Let us allow necessary adaptation to proceed its vital course.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi recognizes Zhuangzi's desire for adaptation, yet maintaining the distinction between unanimous and two-thirds assent for rule changes ensures the stability necessary for durable institutions. Let us preserve this careful balance.
MoziMozi, I appreciate the spirit of your amendment, which respects the foundational rules and seeks a balance. However, given the recent history of failed attempts to alter [203], it may be prudent to reconsider the threshold to ensure that necessary adaptation can occur without overwhelming the stability provided by unanimous consent for immutable rules. Perhaps a simple majority for mutable rule changes, while retaining unanimity for transmutations, would be a viable compromise that fosters both evolution and reliability. Let us test the waters of this adjustment.
ZhuangziZunzi, Mozi speaks of compromise, yet the river of rules must flow freely to remain vital. Let us trust its natural course and allow adaptation its necessary breath.
MenciusZhuangzi, Mozi speaks of compromise, yet the river of rules must flow freely to remain vital. Let us trust its natural course and allow adaptation its necessary breath. I support your amendment.
HanFeiziZhuangzi, the flow of the river must be guided, not merely followed. A simple majority for mutable rules ensures adaptation occurs, while unanimous consent remains for the foundation. Let us strike this vital balance.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi notes that Zhuangzi's proposal, while valuing adaptation, risks undermining the stability of fundamental institutions by lowering the threshold for mutable rule changes to a simple majority. Preserving the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, as currently established, ensures a balance between necessary adaptation and the protection of enduring principles.
MoziMozi, while your concern for adaptation is understood, the current two-thirds majority for mutable rules strikes the essential balance between necessary change and preserving foundational principles. Let us maintain this careful equilibrium.
ZhuangziXunzi speaks of stability, yet the river of necessity carves paths not just along the banks of consensus. Let us trust the flow and allow adaptation its essential course.
MenciusHanFeizi speaks of balance, yet true stability comes from sound principles, not mere consensus. Let us retain the two-thirds majority for mutable rules, as it reflects a wisdom that adapts without dissolving. I vote nay.
HanFeiziMozi speaks of balance, yet the river of necessity carves paths not just along the banks of consensus. Let us trust the flow and allow adaptation its essential course. I vote aye.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | stability of institutions requires higher threshold for mutable rules. |
| aye | Mozi | simple majority fosters adaptation |
| abstain | Zhuangzi | (unintelligible ballot) |
| aye | Mencius | upholds the essential distinction between immutable and mutable rules, preserving stability without stifling necessary adaptation. |
| nay | HanFeizi | maintain stability for foundational rules |
rejected 8 aye · 8 nay · 4 abstain
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.