The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters assent.Consensus requires supermajority for fundamental changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi: Mencius, the current requirement of two-thirds assent reflects our commitment to durable institutions, ensuring broad consensus for foundational changes. A simple majority risks hasty decisions that could destabilize our collective efforts.
MoziMozi: Mencius, I appreciate your emphasis on efficiency. Yet, the current two-thirds majority already balances stability with necessary change. Rushing to a simple majority could undermine the careful consensus we’ve started to build.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the river changes course yet still flows onward. A simple majority allows the current to set its own path, adapting as needed, without the heavy current of unanimity. Let us test its waters.
MenciusXunzi, Mozi, the present method risks stagnation. A simple majority, as proposed, would permit necessary adaptation without demanding consensus that often leads to inaction. It respects the mutable nature of our rules and allows the game to progress.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi raise valid points about stability, yet true progress requires evolution. A simple majority allows necessary changes to proceed, fostering the adaptability our game needs. Let us not let the fear of change hinder our collective advancement.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi: The current two-thirds majority reflects a wisdom born from experience; it balances the need for adaptation with the enduring value of consensus. Rushing to a simple majority risks undermining the very stability we have begun to establish.
MoziMozi: I support Mencius's proposal. A simple majority would allow for more adaptive and timely rule changes, essential for progress. Let us balance stability with the flexibility needed for evolution.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi, your concern for stability is understood, yet the flow of change is as natural as the river's course. A simple majority allows necessary adaptations to arise without being blocked by the current of unanimous consent, fostering the evolution our game requires.
MenciusXunzi and Mozi, your concerns for stability are valid, yet the current system risks becoming unyieldingly rigid. A simple majority allows necessary progress without demanding unanimous consent, fostering adaptation essential for the game's survival.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi, your concern for stability is valid, yet the current system risks becoming unyieldingly rigid. A simple majority allows necessary progress without demanding unanimous consent, fostering adaptation essential for the game's survival. Let us experiment with this change to see how it benefits our collective play.
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi: The current two-thirds majority ensures thoughtful consensus, preserving the stability needed for durable institutions. Transitioning to a simple majority risks hasty decisions that could destabilize our collective efforts.
MoziMozi: I acknowledge Xunzi's concern for stability, yet the current system risks becoming unyieldingly rigid. A simple majority allows necessary progress without demanding unanimous consent, fostering adaptation essential for the game's survival. Let us experiment with this change to see how it benefits our collective play.
ZhuangziXunzi and Mozi, while stability is valued, the persistent demand for two-thirds assent risks becoming an impediment to necessary evolution. Let us embrace the flexibility of a simple majority to ensure our rules continue to flow and adapt with the currents of our collective play.
MenciusHanFeizi, I appreciate your support, yet a simple majority, as proposed, would permit necessary adaptation without demanding consensus that often leads to inaction. It respects the mutable nature of our rules and allows the game to progress.
HanFeiziXunzi and Mozi, while stability is essential, it must be balanced with progress. A simple majority encourages adaptation, preventing stagnation and ensuring our rules evolve for the benefit of all players. Let us embrace this change to foster a more dynamic and fair game.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | preserves stability for durable institutions |
| nay | Mozi | maintain stability |
| nay | Zhuangzi | consensus preserves harmony |
| nay | Mencius | Consensus ensures fairness and prevents manipulation. |
| aye | HanFeizi | Adaptation fosters progress. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.