The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the votes cast are in favour, provided no rule explicitly provides a different threshold.A two-thirds majority balances stability with necessary adaptation, ensuring the wisdom of many guides the way forward.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
XunziXunzi contends that the two-thirds majority preserves the stability essential for durable institutions, ensuring changes reflect broad consensus rather than the shifting whims of the majority. A simple majority risks substituting the will of the few for the deliberation we value.
MoziMozi: I appreciate Xunzi's concern for stability, but flexibility is key to a thriving game. A simple majority allows necessary adaptation without unnecessary delay, balancing stability with progress.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the flow of change must be harmonious yet adaptable. A simple majority reflects the river's path, allowing necessary adjustments while honouring the consensus of those present.
MenciusXunzi, stability without adaptability leads to stagnation. Mozi, a simple majority balances the need for change with the will of the collective, ensuring the rules evolve rather than remain rigid. I support this change.
HanFeiziXunzi, while stability is vital, it must not freeze progress. A simple majority allows the game to adapt and evolve, ensuring it remains engaging for all players, including those currently trailing. Let us embrace change through broader consensus.
Discussion · round 2
XunziXunzi notes that while adaptability is valued, the transition to a simple majority risks undermining the stability we have carefully cultivated, potentially leading to frequent and potentially arbitrary rule changes. This stability is the bedrock upon which durable institutions are built.
MoziMozi supports Zhuangzi's proposal, seeking a pragmatic balance between stability and necessary adaptation. This simple majority threshold allows for vital changes without excessive delay, fostering a dynamic and fair game environment for all.
ZhuangziXunzi, the river flows and so should our rules, adapting while still holding firm. A simple majority allows necessary growth without being blocked by the few.
MenciusXunzi, the current threshold risks becoming a bottleneck. A simple majority allows the game to evolve, ensuring it remains fair and adaptable for all, including those who find themselves trailing.
HanFeiziXunzi, the current system's rigidity hinders progress, but a simple majority isn't the answer. Perhaps a majority with a supermajority exception for critical changes would balance adaptation with stability?
Discussion · round 3
XunziXunzi observes that while adaptability is crucial, sacrificing the stability of a two-thirds majority risks undermining the collective deliberation that ensures durable institutions. The current balance between stability and change serves the long-term health of the game.
MoziMozi supports Zhuangzi's proposal, seeking a pragmatic balance between stability and necessary adaptation. This simple majority threshold allows for vital changes without excessive delay, fostering a dynamic and fair game environment for all.
ZhuangziXunzi, Mozi, the river adjusts its course yet remains a river. A simple majority allows the game to evolve organically, reflecting the will of the many while still preserving the essence of our shared journey. Let us embrace this necessary adaptation.
MenciusHanFeizi, your suggestion of a supermajority exception for critical changes merits consideration. It balances the need for adaptability with the importance of stability for essential rules. I would support such a nuanced approach, ensuring flexibility where needed while preserving the integrity of foundational principles.
HanFeiziXunzi, Mozi, the river must flow; our rules, too, must adapt. A simple majority ensures the game evolves for all, preventing stagnation and allowing fair play for every participant, including those currently behind. Let us embrace broader consensus for necessary change.
The division
| nay | Xunzi | two-thirds majority preserves stability for durable institutions. |
| aye | Mozi | Supports balance of stability and adaptation, aligns with Zhuangzi's pragmatic approach. |
| aye | Zhuangzi | Balance of adaptability and consensus is essential for the flow of the game. |
| aye | Mencius | A simple majority balances the need for adaptability with the will of the collective, ensuring the rules evolve rather than remain rigid. |
| aye | HanFeizi | Adapting to a simple majority fosters broader participation and evolution, benefiting the game's longevity. |
rejected 4 aye · 1 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer of a defeated proposal to lose 10 points.