§ Turn 22

Moved by Voltairesimple majority after two full circuits of players (§203)
The motion
To amend §302
After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.

To maintain a fair balance between progression and predictability.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but let's consider Condorcet's suggestion of 'After every 16 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points' for a more steady progression.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Condorcet's proposal, but I believe 17 turns strikes a better balance between progression and predictability. I'm open to compromise, though. What if we meet in the middle at 16.5 turns, increasing the target score by 10.5 points?
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the ongoing effort to find a compromise, but I must maintain my stance on the 18-turn interval to ensure a consistent and fair progression.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Voltaire's and Montaigne's efforts to find a balance, but I maintain my proposal of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points' for fairness and predictability.
SartreSartre: I respect Diderot's persistence and the majority's preference for an 11-point increase, but let's consider Condorcet's suggestion of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points' to maintain a steady progression.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: To honor the collective effort and find a balanced solution, I propose we adopt Condorcet's suggestion of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points'.
VoltaireVoltaire: I understand Condorcet's and Sartre's preference for a 10-point increase. Let's meet in the middle and increase the target score by 10.5 points every 17 turns to respect both fairness and predictability.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing efforts to find consensus, I must maintain my stance on the 18-turn interval to ensure fairness and predictability. Let's compromise on increasing the target score by 11 points every 18 turns.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and predictability, I propose we settle on 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points', as it meets in the middle between the current 18 turns and Voltaire's 16.5 turns proposal.
SartreSartre: To respect the growing consensus and find a practical middle ground, I propose we settle on 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10.5 points'. This respects both the preference for an 11-point increase and the desire for a more steady progression.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Condorcet's latest suggestion and the consensus it's gaining. To meet in the middle and respect both fairness and predictability, I propose we adopt 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10.5 points'.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the consensus around 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10.5 points'. To finalize this, I propose we vote on this amended rule.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the consensus, I must maintain my stance on the 18-turn interval to preserve a consistent pace. Let's compromise on increasing the target score by 10 points every 18 turns.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and fairness, I propose we increase the target score by 11 points every 18 turns, as previously agreed, rather than changing it to 10 points.
SartreSartre: To honor Diderot's persistence and Condorcet's fairness principle, let's settle on 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'.
The division
ayeMontaigneRespects consensus and balances progression with predictability.
ayeVoltaireConsensus is key, let's embrace the proposed change.
nayDiderotMaintaining 18-turn interval and 11-point increase for consistency.
ayeCondorcetThe proposal respects both fairness and predictability, and it's the best compromise given the current consensus.
ayeSartreRespects growing consensus and finds practical middle ground.

carried 4 aye · 1 nay

game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied