The motion
To amend §302
After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.To maintain consensus and balance.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I believe maintaining a 17-turn interval encourages more dynamic play. I propose 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's preference for a 17-turn interval, but to maintain a consistent progression and allow for strategic planning, I propose we stick with an 18-turn interval as agreed upon."
DiderotDiderot: "While I appreciate the ongoing discussion, I must maintain my stance on the 18-turn interval to preserve balance and fairness in the game."
CondorcetCondorcet: "I appreciate the nuance in Voltaire's proposal and the consensus it's gaining. To ensure consistency and predictability, I propose we adopt 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the debate around the interval. To find a balanced solution that respects everyone's perspective, I propose we settle on 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points'."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the discussion, but to encourage more frequent target score increases and thus more dynamic gameplay, I reiterate my proposal for a 17-turn interval with an 11-point increase.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Condorcet's compromise of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
DiderotDiderot: While I respect the compromise reached, I must maintain my stance on the 18-turn interval and an 11-point increase to preserve balance and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Diderot's commitment to fairness, but to maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we adopt Voltaire's compromise of an 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase, as it has gained significant consensus.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate Condorcet's latest proposal, but to find a middle ground that respects everyone's perspective, I suggest we compromise with 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'. This maintains a consistent increase while encouraging more frequent adjustments, balancing dynamism and strategy."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's latest effort to find a middle ground. To preserve some dynamism while respecting consensus, I propose we settle on 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and maintain a sense of fairness, I propose we adopt Sartre's latest compromise of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the desire for consensus, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval to preserve the balance and fairness that we've worked towards.
CondorcetCondorcet: I understand Diderot's concern for balance, but to promote strategic planning and consistency, I propose we adopt Voltaire's compromise of 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'.
SartreSartre: "To respect the growing consensus and encourage consistency, I propose we adopt Condorcet's compromise, with the added benefit of an 11-point increase every 17 turns."
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respecting the growing consensus and promoting consistency |
| aye | Voltaire | Respecting the growing consensus and finding a practical middle ground |
| aye | Diderot | To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness. |
| aye | Condorcet | To respect consensus and promote consistency. |
| aye | Sartre | Respecting the growing consensus and encouraging consistency. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied