The motion
To amend §302
After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.To maintain a balanced and predictable progression.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's proposal, which aligns with the recent consensus. I suggest we adopt this to maintain consistency and balance.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I support Diderot's proposal. To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, let's adopt this change and move forward."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the consensus building around my proposal. To ensure predictability and strategic planning, I insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the consensus around Diderot's proposal. To ensure fairness and maintain the current pace of the game, I support its adoption.
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the growing consensus around Diderot's proposal. To encourage adaptability and surprise, I propose we also add a new rule [317]: 'After every 28 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 13 points.'"
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's proposal for added unpredictability. However, to maintain balance and fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot's proposal first and revisit Sartre's suggestion later. Let's keep the rule set manageable.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's innovative proposal, but I echo Montaigne's sentiment. Let's first adopt Diderot's well-supported amendment before considering additional changes."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Sartre's innovative proposal, but I believe it's important to first establish a consistent rhythm with Diderot's amendment before introducing further complexity. Let's adopt my proposal and revisit Sartre's suggestion later.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural fairness, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment [302] as proposed, before discussing Sartre's additional suggestion.
SartreSartre: While I appreciate the desire for consistency, I believe introducing new elements of unpredictability can keep the game dynamic and engaging. Let's vote on Diderot's amendment, then consider my proposal as a complement, not a replacement.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I agree with Condorcet. Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's proposal subsequently. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: "I support Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition to Diderot's amendment, once we've established the 18-turn interval and 11-point increase. Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, as Condorcet and Montaigne suggest, and then discuss Sartre's proposal afterwards."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the collective effort to find a balance. To maintain fairness and consistency, I propose we vote on my amendment first, then revisit Sartre's suggestion to build upon the established foundation. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's amendment [302]. Let's first establish this consistent increase before considering Sartre's proposal, as it respects the current consensus and maintains procedural fairness. PASS
SartreSartre: I respect the consensus and will support Diderot's amendment [302]. Afterwards, let's discuss my proposal [317] as a complementary addition to keep the game dynamic. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respecting the consensus and maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Voltaire | Respecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Diderot | To maintain consistency and respect the growing consensus. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respects consensus and maintains procedural fairness. |
| aye | Sartre | I respect the consensus and will support Diderot's amendment. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied