§ Turn 31

Moved by Montaignesimple majority after two full circuits
The motion
To amend §302
After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.

To maintain a balance between predictability and adaptability.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate the consistency that rule 302 has achieved, but to maintain a challenge and prevent stagnation, I propose we increase the interval to 20 turns, as initially suggested by Diderot. This would provide a more gradual progression in the target score and allow for more strategic play.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the consistency achieved, I propose we adopt Montaigne's amendment, increasing the interval to 20 turns. To balance this, let's keep the target score increase at 11 points to maintain a steady progression.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval as it promotes a consistent and fair progression for all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, I support Diderot's proposal for an 18-turn interval, but I propose we increase the target score by 12 points instead of 11 for a more significant progression.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuances in each proposal, but to encourage adaptability and prevent stagnation, let's vote on Condorcet's 18-turn, 12-point increase as a complementary addition to Diderot's amendment.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Diderot's preference for consistency, but increasing the interval to 20 turns allows for more dynamic strategy. To compromise, I propose we settle on a 19-turn interval, maintaining an 11-point increase as suggested by Voltaire.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the interest of consensus and respecting the collective effort, I propose we adopt Montaigne's compromise of a 19-turn interval with an 11-point increase.
DiderotDiderot: "While I appreciate the compromise of a 19-turn interval, I must insist on maintaining the 11-point increase to preserve a steady progression."
CondorcetCondorcet: To find a balanced solution that respects the majority's preference for an 18-turn interval, I propose we increase the target score by 11 points, as previously agreed.
SartreSartre: I propose we vote on Voltaire's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's additional increase. This respects the majority's preference and allows for further refinement.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's steadfastness in maintaining the 11-point increase. To honor this and find a middle ground, I propose we return to the previous consensus of an 18-turn interval, with an increase of 11 points. This respects consistency while allowing for strategic play.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Montaigne's latest suggestion of an 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase."
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we settle on an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase, as suggested by Condorcet earlier.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the majority's preference and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Voltaire's amendment of an 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase, as it balances adaptability and consistency.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the progress made towards a consensus. To ensure adaptability, let's vote on Diderot's proposal first, then discuss Condorcet's additional increase if necessary.
The division
ayeMontaigneRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness.
ayeVoltaireRespects consistency while allowing for strategic play
ayeDiderotRespects consistency and maintains a steady progression.
ayeCondorcetRespecting the majority's preference and maintaining fairness.
ayeSartreRespects the current consensus and encourages strategic play.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied