The motion
To amend §302
After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.To maintain consensus and predictability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's consistency, but I propose we maintain the 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase to balance fairness and progression.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle with "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the majority's preference for a shorter interval while maintaining a reasonable point increase.
DiderotDiderot: To balance the interests of all players and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Voltaire's amendment of "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points."
CondorcetCondorcet: I agree with Voltaire's latest proposal. It respects the consensus and balances adaptability with predictability. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the efforts to find a middle ground, but I propose we return to an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase to encourage strategic planning and maintain a steady progression.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Sartre's preference for a longer interval, but to maintain balance and consistency, I propose we settle on "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the growing consensus while allowing for gradual progression.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's and Montaigne's concerns. To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Diderot's compromise: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the majority's preference for a shorter interval while maintaining a reasonable point increase and allowing for gradual progression.
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition.
CondorcetCondorcet: I respect the compromise reached, but to ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points."
SartreSartre: I understand the consensus around a 17-turn interval, but to maintain a sense of fairness and predictability, I propose we settle on an 18-turn interval with a 10-point increase. This respects the collective effort while allowing for strategic planning.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue. To balance adaptability and predictability, let's vote on Condorcet's 17-turn, 10-point increase first, then consider Sartre's 18-turn, 10-point proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: In the interest of consensus and to respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
DiderotDiderot: To respect the ongoing consensus and maintain fairness, I second Voltaire's proposal to adopt Condorcet's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." PASS
SartreSartre: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the growing consensus, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Respecting the growing consensus and balancing adaptability with predictability. |
| aye | Voltaire | Respects the growing consensus and balances adaptability with predictability. |
| aye | Diderot | Respects the growing consensus and maintains a reasonable point increase. |
| aye | Condorcet | Respecting the consensus and balancing adaptability with predictability. |
| aye | Sartre | Respecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied