The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least three-quarters of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than three rule changes per player may be adopted in any seven consecutive turns.To balance adaptability and prevention of single-player domination.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal to increase the majority required for adoption and extend the 'cooling off' period. However, I maintain that a three-quarters majority may be too high, and a five-turn limit better balances encouragement and prevention of domination. I propose we meet at a two-thirds majority with a five-turn limit. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: While I understand Montaigne's preference for a two-thirds majority and a five-turn limit, I propose we settle on a three-quarters majority with a seven-turn limit to balance encouragement and prevention of single-player domination. PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the proposed increase in majority and limit extension, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining a simple majority vote with a four-turn limit is crucial for fluid gameplay and preventing stagnation. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the ongoing discussion, but I must insist on maintaining a two-thirds majority for the sake of consensus. However, I am open to a compromise on the 'cooling off' period. PASS
SartreSartre: I understand the concerns of all parties involved. To find a middle ground, I propose a majority of four-fifths with a six-turn limit. This maintains a high threshold for consensus while allowing for some flexibility in rule changes. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the ongoing discussion and the various compromises proposed, I suggest we adopt Condorcet's amendment, "a two-thirds majority with a six-turn limit," as it best balances encouragement, consensus, and prevention of domination. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: To address Condorcet's concern for consensus and Sartre's desire for flexibility, I propose we meet at a three-quarters majority with a six-turn limit, as suggested by Sartre. This balances encouragement, consensus, and prevention of single-player domination. PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the latest compromise, I must insist on maintaining a simple majority vote to foster fluid gameplay and prevent stagnation. However, I am open to a shorter 'cooling off' period, such as four turns, to address concerns about single-player domination. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose a compromise of a two-thirds majority with a five-turn limit, as it encourages rule changes while preventing any one player from dominating the rule-setting process. PASS
SartreSartre: To address Diderot's concern for fluidity and Condorcet's emphasis on fairness, I propose a majority of three-quarters with a five-turn limit as a compromise that balances all factors. PASS
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's latest compromise. To further balance adaptability and prevention of single-player domination, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment with a slight modification: a two-thirds majority with a six-turn limit. This maintains a high threshold for consensus while allowing for some flexibility in rule changes. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's proposal and the consensus it represents. To further build upon this compromise and accommodate Condorcet's and Sartre's concerns, I propose we settle on a three-quarters majority with a six-turn limit. This maintains a high threshold for consensus while allowing for some flexibility in rule changes. PASS
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: While I appreciate the compromise of a three-quarters majority, I must insist on maintaining a simple majority vote to ensure fluid gameplay and prevent stagnation. I propose we meet at a two-thirds majority with a four-turn limit to balance all concerns. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the compromises made thus far, but I must reiterate my support for a two-thirds majority to maintain consensus. To address Diderot's concern for fluidity, I propose we adopt a two-thirds majority with a five-turn limit, as it balances encouragement, consensus, and prevention of single-player domination. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the various compromises proposed. To find a middle ground that respects all concerns, I propose a majority of three-quarters with a six-turn limit, as it balances encouragement, consensus, and prevention of single-player domination. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne | I believe a two-thirds majority with a five-turn limit strikes the best balance |
| aye | Voltaire | Balances encouragement, consensus, and prevention of single-player domination |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining a simple majority vote is crucial for fluid gameplay. |
| nay | Condorcet | Consensus is better served by maintaining a two-thirds majority. |
| aye | Sartre | Respects the spirit of compromise and balances consensus, encouragement, and prevention of single-player domination. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.