The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two rule changes per player may be adopted in any five consecutive turns.To balance adaptability and prevention of single-player domination.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal to further limit the frequency of rule changes. However, I suggest we maintain the current limit to prevent overly rapid shifts in the ruleset.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's concern for stability. To balance adaptability and prevention of rapid shifts, I propose we compromise at a limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing discussion, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining the current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns ensures a balance between adaptability and stability.
CondorcetCondorcet: Condorcet: I understand the need for balance and agree with Diderot's stance. The current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns strikes that balance effectively. PASS
SartreSartre: "I appreciate the ongoing dialogue. To balance adaptability and prevention of rapid shifts, I propose we meet at two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns, with a provision for a majority veto to prevent unwanted changes."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate Sartre's compromise, I propose we settle on a limit of two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns to balance adaptability with stability, and include a majority veto provision as suggested by Sartre. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's willingness to meet in the middle at two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns. To further build consensus, I propose we include a provision for a two-thirds majority veto to prevent unwanted changes, as suggested by Sartre. PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the proposed compromise, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns. I believe this limit strikes the best balance between adaptability and stability, and a majority veto provision should suffice for preventing unwanted changes. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: While I understand the proposal to limit rule changes, I must insist on maintaining the current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns to preserve the balance between adaptability and stability.
SartreSartre: "To accommodate Diderot's concern for stability and maintain a balanced approach, I propose a limit of two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns, with a provision for a two-thirds majority veto to prevent unwanted changes, as suggested by Voltaire."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate the two-thirds majority veto proposal, I suggest we maintain the current majority veto to balance prevention of unwanted changes with the principle of majority rule.
VoltaireVoltaire: To address Diderot's concern and find common ground, I propose we compromise at a limit of two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns, with a provision for a two-thirds majority veto, as suggested by Sartre and myself. This limit balances adaptability and stability while maintaining a strong veto threshold to prevent unwanted changes. PASS
DiderotDiderot: Diderot: I appreciate the proposed compromise, but I must reiterate my stance: maintaining the current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns ensures a balance between adaptability and stability, and a simple majority veto is sufficient for preventing unwanted changes.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we settle at a limit of two rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns, with a simple majority veto to respect the principle of majority rule. PASS
SartreSartre: "To respect the ongoing negotiations and the need for adaptability, I propose we settle on a limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns, with a simple majority veto, as suggested by Condorcet. This compromise balances adaptability, stability, and the principle of majority rule." PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne | I appreciate the compromise, but I believe a limit of two is more stable. |
| aye | Voltaire | Compromise limit respects adaptability and stability. |
| nay | Diderot | I insist on maintaining the current limit of three rule changes per player in any five consecutive turns. |
| aye | Condorcet | The proposed limit balances adaptability with stability, and maintains the principle of majority rule. |
| aye | Sartre | Respecting the ongoing negotiations and balancing adaptability, stability, and majority rule. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 28 · Proposal §328 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than three rule changes per player may be adopted in any five consecutive turns. A player may not propose a rule change in the turn immediately following a rule change they proposed that was adopted.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds of the eligible voters vote aye, and no more than two rule changes per player may be adopted in any five consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 2 points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.