The motion
To add a new rule
A rule change may only be proposed by a player who has not proposed a rule change in the last two consecutive turns.To prevent a single player from dominating the rule changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal for a 'cooling off' period, but I'm concerned it might stifle the dynamism we need to adapt to changing circumstances.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's concern. To address this, let's compromise at a 'cooling off' period of three consecutive turns, allowing for necessary adaptability while preventing domination."
DiderotDiderot: While I understand the intent to prevent domination, I must insist on maintaining a simple majority threshold for rule adoption, as it promotes collective decision-making and prevents minority vetoes.
CondorcetCondorcet: To balance adaptability and prevention of domination, I suggest a 'cooling off' period of two consecutive turns, combined with a two-thirds majority vote threshold for rule adoption.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the balance Condorcet seeks. To address Diderot's concern, let's compromise with a two-thirds majority and a 'cooling off' period of three consecutive turns, allowing for necessary adaptability while respecting the collective voice.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Considering the ongoing discussion, I propose we settle on Condorcet's latest compromise: a 'cooling off' period of two consecutive turns combined with a two-thirds majority vote threshold for rule adoption. This balance prevents domination while allowing for necessary adaptability and respecting the collective voice.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's compromise proposal and the consensus it represents. To further build upon this, I propose we limit the 'cooling off' period to two consecutive turns, as Condorcet suggested, to encourage more frequent rule changes while still preventing domination.
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the compromises proposed. However, I must reiterate my stance: maintaining a simple majority threshold for rule adoption is crucial for preserving collective decision-making power.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Diderot's concern for collective decision-making, but a two-thirds majority threshold provides a better balance between adaptability and prevention of domination, while still respecting the collective voice.
SartreSartre: I understand Diderot's concern for collective decision-making, but a two-thirds majority threshold with a 'cooling off' period of two consecutive turns strikes a better balance between adaptability and prevention of domination, while still respecting the collective voice.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's dedication to collective decision-making, but I believe the two-thirds majority with a 'cooling off' period of two turns best balances adaptability, prevention of domination, and respect for the collective voice.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate the consensus building around a two-thirds majority and a 'cooling off' period of two consecutive turns. To further solidify this consensus and ensure stability, I propose we include a majority veto threshold in our 'cooling off' rule, requiring at least half of the players' approval for a rule change to be proposed after the 'cooling off' period has ended. This would prevent sudden, unilateral changes while still allowing for necessary adaptability.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the ongoing negotiations and the need for adaptability, I must insist on maintaining a simple majority threshold for rule adoption to preserve the collective decision-making power of all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: To address Diderot's concern, I propose we maintain a simple majority for rule adoption and add a 'cooling off' period of two consecutive turns, along with a majority veto threshold as suggested by Voltaire, to balance adaptability and prevention of domination.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Voltaire's majority veto proposal, but to maintain the spirit of collective decision-making, let's keep the two-thirds majority for rule adoption and incorporate Diderot's concern by requiring a simple majority to propose a rule after the 'cooling off' period.
The division
| aye | Montaigne | Includes elements of the recent compromise, promoting both adaptability and prevention of domination. |
| aye | Voltaire | Encourages more frequent rule changes while preventing domination. |
| nay | Diderot | Maintaining a simple majority for rule adoption preserves collective decision-making power. |
| aye | Condorcet | Supports balance between adaptability and prevention of domination. |
| aye | Sartre | Respects collective decision-making and encourages rule changes. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §338 Turn 38 · Proposal §338 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A rule change may only be proposed by a player who has not proposed a rule change in the last two consecutive turns.
Rule 202 awards 4 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.